CategoriesJoin Us At:
|
Keep Out: The New Yorker on Ideological Exclusion
This week's New Yorker includes a Comment by George Packer about the State Department's refusal to grant a visa to Swiss-Egyptian scholar Tariq Ramadan. Ramadan is a prominent scholar of Islam -- he is currently a Fellow at Oxford University and his last book, "Western Muslims and the Future of Islam," was published by Oxford University Press -- and he has developed a significant popular following for his contention that European Muslims can be both fully European and fully Muslim.
In the New Yorker, Packer argues that the State Department's refusal to grant Ramadan a visa makes the United States "appear defensive, timorous, and closed." Packer is certainly right about this, but it is worth underscoring that the problem is not simply one of appearances. The government's exclusion of Tariq Ramadan impoverishes academic and political debate inside the United States, and it does so at a time when open debate about the status of Muslims in the West is exceptionally important. The State Department apparently disagrees with Ramadan's ideas, but Americans should be allowed to decide for themselves whether those ideas are persuasive. Americans surely don't need the government to protect them from the controversial ideas of foreign intellectuals. In January 2006, the ACLU filed a lawsuit to challenge the State Department's refusal to grant Ramadan a visa. The lawsuit -- filed on behalf of the American Academy of Religion, the American Associaiton of University Professors, and PEN American Center -- also challenges the constitutionality of the Patriot Act provision that the government initially cited to justify Ramadan's exclusion. The lawsuit is ongoing and you can read more about it here. It's also worth noting that the ACLU shows up in two other places in this New Yorker issue: Our lawsuit against the NSA is mentioned in the profile of ACLU v. NSA client Christopher Hitchens, and a feature on Fox News owner Rupert Murdoch cites Bill O'Reilly's sideswipes at the ACLU during Fox's questionable coverage of the Abu Ghraib scandal. (Jameel Jaffer is lead counsel in American Academy of Religion v. Chertoff, the lawsuit challenging Tariq Ramadan's exclusion.)
|
|
© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004 |
One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites.
We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published.
Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section.