CategoriesJoin Us At:
|
Can We Talk? Making Sense of the ACLU's Many VoicesProducing a short video that captures the many voices of the ACLU at this year’s membership conference wasn’t a simple task. It’s what I imagine the old cliché “herding cats” must be like — nearly impossible and all over the place. Our ACLU members are more than happy to share their thoughts: proudly, defiantly, loudly and often in rambling form. So how do you make one coherent compilation of a million different opinions? The answer is to shoot first (video that is) and edit later. Ruthlessly edit. This is in everyone’s best interest. The members look better for it, and viewers get to enjoy a pithier, more succinct smorgasbord of commentary. Still, there are so many topics and even more to say. Where do I begin in compiling the “Voices of the ACLU?” At the start. I was curious about our members’ first time: The first time they head about or experienced the ACLU. Often, as many do, they heard about us in a negative or stereotypical light. It was interesting to see how some looked past the stereotype and became part of an ACLU that spoke to them. Now, as “card-carrying” members, these folks who look like anyone in middle America debunk the ACLU stereotype every day. I was also curious about what draws our members to the ACLU. And for fun, I wondered how they would respond if they could only pick two rights in the Constitution to live under. I organized the video in sections, where you see a series of members answer the same question. What impressed me most about the 2008 Membership Conference was the incredible number of young people (teens and 20s) who attended. There was even a caravan of buses filled with youth that made the trek to Washington, D.C., from Florida. One of my favorite interviews was with an 18-year-old who just graduated from high school. He told me that he came from a very conservative, Christian family in Florida (not what you’d expect as the typical ACLU membership base). The young man said his parents often spoke ill of the ACLU. But he couldn’t pass up a trip to see the nation’s Capitol and to see for himself what the ACLU was really about. He worried that his devout Catholic faith and belief in Jesus (“J.C. all the way!” he shouted into my camera) would make him an outcast among ACLU members. But he experienced just the opposite. He was excited to learn the ACLU even has a Freedom of Religion and Belief Project. This young man left the conference energized that he could be a part of a group that promises to respect and protect everyone’s rights. He said it showed him what America is supposed to be about. A real-life lesson he was able to learn at the ACLU membership conference, between visits to the monuments and museums of our nation’s founding. Perhaps the answer to the impossible task of capturing the many voices of the ACLU is listening to this young man. He says it all.
We intend the comments portion of this blog to be a forum where you can freely express your views on blog postings and on comments made by other people. Given that, please understand that you are responsible for the material you post on the comments portion of this blog. The only postings that we ask that you refrain from posting and that we cannot permit on our website are requests for legal assistance and postings that could cause ACLU to incur legal liability.
One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites. We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published. Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section. 26 Responses to "Can We Talk? Making Sense of the ACLU's Many Voices" |
|
© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004 |
Jun 20th, 2008 at 3:35pm
When/where are the rest of the podcasts that you all recorded going to be posted?
Jun 20th, 2008 at 4:00pm
Pike: Next week. We promise.
Jun 28th, 2008 at 1:36pm
Now that USSC (Heller) has disposed of the collective rights fiction regarding the Second Amendment, and asserted not only the individual right to keep and bear arms, but the right to self defense, can we expect the ACLU will now also recognize these fundamental civil liberties and work to protect them?
Jun 29th, 2008 at 9:41pm
The ACLU interprets the Second Amendment as a collective right. Therefore, we disagree with the Supreme Court's decision in D.C. v. Heller. While the decision is a significant and historic reinterpretation of the right to keep and bear arms, the decision leaves many important questions unanswered that will have to be resolved in future litigation, including what regulations are permissible, and which weapons are embraced by the Second Amendment right that the Court has now recognized.
Jun 29th, 2008 at 9:55pm
So the ACLU only supports freedom when it fits into what they believe.
The Second amendment was never reinterpreted, anyone that says it was is a total idiot.
Jun 29th, 2008 at 10:20pm
The Bill of Rights isn't a buffet, you can't just pick and choose what Amendments you like and don't like.
Sorry, ACLU - you just lost my renewal and any future chance for funding from my family.
Jun 29th, 2008 at 10:35pm
>The ACLU interprets the Second Amendment as a collective right.
lol wut
Jun 30th, 2008 at 6:05am
But, your interpretation of the Second Amendment is legally incorrect subsequent to Heller. In other SCOTUSdecisions, notably Roe v. Wade, the ACLU has not recognized dissenting opinions, so, why, in this case, is the ACLU refusing to accept a clear SCOTUS decision on civil liberties?
Jun 30th, 2008 at 6:48am
So the ACLU is now going to treat the BOR as a buffet that they can pick and choose from? Saying that they disagree with the SC and will not support a right that has been affirmed sounds remarkably the Bush administration.
Jun 30th, 2008 at 11:23am
While SCOTUS was split 5-4 on the extent of the right and its application to three very narrow laws of limited jurisdiction, the judges were unanimous that the 2nd Amendment protects an individual right. With that part of the decision being 9-0, the ACLU is hard-pressed to viably disagree.
Jun 30th, 2008 at 3:43pm
If I do not have an individual right to self defense, none of the other rights you purport to defend have any meaning.
What, really, is the point in legally helping me not get harassed for cross-dressing at work, when one creep, one crowbar, and one dark alley are all that are necessary to keep me from ever going in to work again?
Seriously, I want an answer. How is it logically consistent to tell me I must willingly die in that alley?
Jun 30th, 2008 at 4:21pm
The ACLU sounds like a white southern, still refusing to accept that the "negros" are people, with the same full rights as the "decent folk".
ACLU should be *CHEERING* and *APPLAUDING* when a fundemental human rights of the citizens is upheld and protected.
What gives?
Jun 30th, 2008 at 7:45pm
My name isn't ACLU, This is a test to see if someone can make the claim that the ACLU actively opposes the 2A.
Jul 1st, 2008 at 11:40am
Suzanne Ito, of the ACLU said, “The ACLU interprets the Second Amendment as a collective right. Therefore, we disagree with the Supreme Court’s decision in D.C. v. Heller.”
Is that not opposing the 2A, since the SCOTUS has interpreted as being an individual right?
Jul 1st, 2008 at 10:35pm
San Dimas High footbal rules! Wyld Stallynz!
Or, further proof any old idiot can come along and make a post under "ACLU."
Jul 2nd, 2008 at 10:06am
That may be true, but ACLU has confirmed the statement given in 4 above in a brand new Heller blog item:
http://blog.aclu.org/2008/07/01/heller-decision-and-the-s econd-amendment/
Jul 2nd, 2008 at 4:57pm
to be honest, I will beleive it when I see it on the policy section. One person with an agenda does NOT make ACLU policy. When/if they change the policypage, then I will back off my support.
Jul 20th, 2008 at 6:03am
going down your list of people to protect i see lot's of right's. i see women right's BUT THERE IS NO CHILD RIGHT's.I want to know why?
Aug 23rd, 2008 at 10:42am
This page does not render correctly under Firefox 3.0.1 for Linux with Flash 9.0 r124. It looks like there's a syntax error. I'm unable to watch the video.
Oct 8th, 2008 at 4:40am
dear ACLU,
please let me know how to help members of this church preaching the holiness of a religious bloc vote. it 'threatens' its members with excommunication (which to them means sure damnation in hell) if they vote in a disobedient manner.
family and friends of mine belong to this church. this church originated from the philippines, and is now spread all over the world.
their church administration dictates their unity vote the night before the day of elections. members are indoctrinated to tell on fellow members who do not follow god's will.
how can i help them? isn't a vote an individual right?
Feb 6th, 2009 at 4:40am
Please help the hard working women of Lafayette College. Six women have come forth to stop sexual harassment at the college. The pervert responsible for sexually harassing these women was sentenced to 18 months probation in a plea bargain. How could such a plea bargain be available this scares me. The man accused of the harassment is basically walking away untouched. He got his rocks off for years at these women’s expense. This man was put in a position to protect the college, its employees, and its students. Below are the local newspapers links to the articles. Please help these women return to there jobs. These women were scared to come forth because the man responsible carried a gun and must have had some kind of connection with college considering he worked there for 20 years. Lafayette is trying to sweep this under the rug and its working. I hope the ACLU can help these women and make it known that these type of actions will not just be swept under the table.
http://www.mcall.com/news/local/all-b4_3lafayette.676928 1feb04,0,2728419.story
http://www.lehighvalleylive.com/easton/i ndex.ssf/2009/02/sixth_woman_files_civil_lawsui.html
Jul 17th, 2009 at 11:33pm
i want to know why the aclu claims to defend liberty yet there isnt a tab on this blog for soldier rights. and whats with having to donate in order to become a member. you liberals contradict yourselves all the time.
Jul 19th, 2009 at 9:33am
The ACLU is famous for distorting the truth to fit their own agenda.
Sep 24th, 2009 at 6:30pm
I am not able to download...suggestions?
Sep 24th, 2009 at 6:37pm
Would that Mister Ben Dover would read the Constitution and _The Federalist Papers_ carefully, to see how he is currently distorting the truth of hos the ACLU is protecting the basic agenda: freedom, for all Americans, including Mr. Dover.
Sep 24th, 2009 at 6:38pm
Oh, I WAS able to download the video...it just took a long time. Thanks, I enjoyed the video very much.