Categories
Join Us At:
|
Hamdan Trial a "Disaster"If there was ever any doubt that the military commissions process, and Guantanamo in general, are a stain on the United States' record, you need only see the headline from today's U.K.-based The Times, which reads: "Bin Laden driver Salim Hamdan trial a disaster for George Bush." After seeking 30 years in prison for Hamdan, in a military tribunal, before a military jury, and in a trial where many rights normally afforded defendants in a civilian court were greatly curtailed, the five and a half year sentence was nothing short of a disaster for the Bush administration. It's hard to believe the White House and Pentagon's comments that the administration is pleased with the outcome. A good deal of analysis, including the ACLU's own, concludes that the material support conviction, coupled with the light sentence, was meant as a rebuke to the White House — the jury of six military officers’ way of sending a signal that the trial doesn’t live up to the rule of law. This sentiment was apparent among many early on, starting with prominent figures such as Alberto Mora, Antonio Taguba and Mo Davis speaking out against these proceedings. Someone else of prominence who's speaking out against Guantanamo is former President Jimmy Carter, who yesterday issued a statement of support for our John Adams Project.
We intend the comments portion of this blog to be a forum where you can freely express your views on blog postings and on comments made by other people. Given that, please understand that you are responsible for the material you post on the comments portion of this blog. The only postings that we ask that you refrain from posting and that we cannot permit on our website are requests for legal assistance and postings that could cause ACLU to incur legal liability.
One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites. We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published. Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section. 1 Response to "Hamdan Trial a "Disaster"" |
|
|
© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004 |
Aug 13th, 2008 at 8:39am
Court disasters are closer than you might want to believe. This crime by attorneys,judges and a state sentator is yet to met justice. Talk about cooked courts this one, well just look. www.mftms13.wordpress.com