Categories
Join Us At:
|
The Pre-RNC LawsuitsThe ACLU of Minnesota has been working since November to secure the rights of protestors who want to march outside of Minneapolis's Xcel Center during the Republican National Convention. The first lawsuit, Coalition to March v. City of St. Paul, charged that the city violated the Coalition's free speech and due process rights by issuing a "Conditional Alternative Permit" in response to the Coalition's demonstration application. Unfortunately, U.S. District Court Judge Joan Ericson ruled against the ACLU's plaintiffs. In a second lawsuit, the ACLU of Minnesota represented Impeach for Peace, a non-partisan grassroots group. In that lawsuit, the ACLU again argued that the demonstration zone was inadequate and did not guarantee sight and sound access to Xcel Center. In addition, the City of St. Paul never divulged whether and to what extent the view will be obstructed by fencing, buses and tents; or if the area will be a three-sided pen that would severely limit incoming and outgoing foot traffic. The suit also challenged the guidelines regulating speech—like what rights protestors have to hold signs, demonstration, or distribute literature—which are subject to last-minute changes as the City deems fit. A federal judge ruled against the ACLU's plaintiffs in that case as well. Lawsuits aside now, like the ACLU of Colorado, the ACLU of Minnesota is closely monitoring the protests and how the police are treating arrestees. They've recruited civil and criminal defense attorneys to be at the jails and various venues where protestors are being booked. In addition, attorneys assembled by the ACLU of Minnesota will offer limited defense to those arrested during their upcoming arraignments.
We intend the comments portion of this blog to be a forum where you can freely express your views on blog postings and on comments made by other people. Given that, please understand that you are responsible for the material you post on the comments portion of this blog. The only postings that we ask that you refrain from posting and that we cannot permit on our website are requests for legal assistance and postings that could cause ACLU to incur legal liability.
One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites. We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published. Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section. 1 Response to "The Pre-RNC Lawsuits" |
|
|
© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004 |
Sep 4th, 2008 at 4:40pm
I defend anyone's right to PROTEST anything. I defend no one's "right" to DISRUPT things. DISRUPTION is a violation of the other person's first amendment rights. NO ONE GROUP HAS SUPERIOR FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS. The Westboro Baptist Church has proven that point with their disgusting behavior. DISRUPTION includes rioting, destruction of private or public property, behaving in a manner which makes it impossible for the "other" group to conduct business or for the "other speaker" to speak, blocking public traffic and public access to private property. The RNC has the right to hold the CONVENTION of their PRIVATE PARTY in peace. The demonstrators have the right to demonstrate provided they do not attempt to deny the first amendment rights of those they are demostrating against.