www.aclu.orgJOIN THE ACLUTAKE ACTIONDONATEABOUT US
ACLU Blog of Rights - Official Blog of the ACLU National Office Blog of Rights Homepage Support the ACLU

Join Us At:

Sep 19th, 2008 Google Bookmarks Technorati StumbleUpon Digg! Reddit Delicious Facebook
Posted by Chris Hampton, LGBT Project at 4:28pm

Great Decision in Our Transgender Discrimination Case Against the Library of Congress!

We've just gotten word from the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia that the ACLU has won our case on behalf of Diane Schroer, a retired Army Colonel who was offered a job as a terrorism research analyst at the Library of Congress, only to have the offer rescinded when she told her future supervisor that she was in the process of gender transition. You can read the decision here.

If you get an error message while attempting to view this clip, please reload the page or press F5.
Please note that by playing this clip You Tube and Google will place a long-term cookie on your computer. Please see You Tube's privacy statement on their website and Google's privacy statement on theirs to learn more. To view the ACLU's privacy statement, click here.
Schroer was an Airborne Ranger qualified Special Forces officer who completed over 450 parachute jumps, received numerous decorations including the Defense Superior Service Medal, and was hand-picked to head up a classified national security operation. She began taking steps to transition from male to female shortly after retiring as a Colonel after 25 years of distinguished service in the Army.

When she interviewed for a job as a terrorism research analyst at the Library of Congress, she thought she'd found the perfect fit, given her background and 16,000-volume home library collection on military history, the art of war, international relations and political philosophy. Schroer accepted the position, but the offer was revoked when she told her future supervisor that she was in the process of gender transition. The ACLU then represented her in a Title VII sex discrimination lawsuit against the Library of Congress. You may recall that LGBT Project Director Matt Coles wrote about this case after attending the trial.

The big news is that the court ruled that discriminating against someone for changing genders is sex discrimination under federal law. In reaching its decision, the court ruled: "The evidence established that the Library was enthusiastic about hiring David Schroer — until she disclosed her transsexuality. The Library revoked the offer when it learned that a man named David intended to become, legally, culturally, and physically, a woman named Diane. This was discrimination 'because of . . . sex.'"

This is an important first, and one that we hope will pave the way toward ending discrimination against transgender people who only want, like everyone else, to be secure in their jobs and earn a living.

Diane Schroer served her country with great honor and selflessness for 25 years, and wanted only to continue that with the job at the Library of Congress. She has been a hero to many people for many years for many different reasons. Today, she's an even bigger hero to all of us.

Want to learn more about how to fight for equal rights for transgender people in your hometown, county, or state? Visit the ACLU LGBT Project's online toolkit, Get Busy, Get Equal!

Google Bookmarks Technorati StumbleUpon Digg! Reddit Delicious Facebook
We intend the comments portion of this blog to be a forum where you can freely express your views on blog postings and on comments made by other people. Given that, please understand that you are responsible for the material you post on the comments portion of this blog. The only postings that we ask that you refrain from posting and that we cannot permit on our website are requests for legal assistance and postings that could cause ACLU to incur legal liability.

One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites.

We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published.

Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section.

6 Responses to "Great Decision in Our Transgender Discrimination Case Against the Library of Congress!"

  1. Kelli Busey Says:

    Thank you ACLU !!!!!!!!! What a great day for freedom!

  2. sr1 Says:

    This is disgusting, this man belongs in an institution. The ACLU should help people like this understand they have a problem not encourage them.

  3. Roxanne Mahon Says:

    Thank you that this discrimination is finally crumbling. There may be freedom for us some day, after all.

  4. AD Says:

    An you belong in a school. We transsexuals indeed have a problem and the only cure known is surgery - sex reassignment.

  5. Milt Says:

    Will this case in any way effect women in the military? Specifically, many of Dianne's (as David) experiences, that made her the most qualified applicant for the Library of Congress position, are currently not accessible to individuals born in a female body. Not to say she doesn't deserve the job (from everything I've read about Dianne, she is truly an amazing human being) - but no one born in a female body could have accumulated the experiences she did and therefore there is another level of sex discrimination going on here.

  6. Queer Historian Says:

    Everyone should have the freedom to live and work as we wish. This is a monumental decision that effects so many of us. Thank you!

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image. Ignore spaces and be careful about upper and lower case.
 

Quicksearch


© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004
This is the Web site of the American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU Foundation.
Learn more about the distinction between these two components of the ACLU.

User Agreement | Privacy Statement | FAQs | Site Map

Statistics image