CategoriesJoin Us At:
|
Life in Prison is No BailoutHere's an angle to the economic bailout-rescue-panic package that you probably haven't thought of: the exorbitant cost of capital punishment to death penalty states. From California, to Maryland, to Tennessee, to New Jersey, the taxpayer burden to execute a prisoner is significantly higher than the cost of a life sentence. Jack Payden-Travers of the ACLU's Capital Punishment Project writes today in the Pasadena Star-News: In Maryland, the Urban Institute study of March 2008 noted that it costs the state three times more to try a death penalty case than a non-death penalty case. The report stated that "an average capital-eligible case resulting in a death sentence will cost approximately $3 million, $1.9 million more than a case where the death penalty was not sought."Jack points out that there are approximately 3,300 men and women on death row right now. That's billions of dollars to execute these prisoners. The death penalty is a morally and fiscally bankrupt policy, and it's time to abolish it.
We intend the comments portion of this blog to be a forum where you can freely express your views on blog postings and on comments made by other people. Given that, please understand that you are responsible for the material you post on the comments portion of this blog. The only postings that we ask that you refrain from posting and that we cannot permit on our website are requests for legal assistance and postings that could cause ACLU to incur legal liability.
One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites. We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published. Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section. 3 Responses to "Life in Prison is No Bailout" |
|
© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004 |
Oct 2nd, 2008 at 11:01am
> In the last 3 decades, 129 individuals have been released from death row because they were innocent
What I want to know is, how many of those 129 inmates were released because of DNA forensics that were unavailable when they were first convicted? According to Wikipedia, the first such case where DNA fingerprinting was used was in 1987, and presumably didn't become standard and commonplace for several years afterwards.
The morality and effectiveness of capital punishment aside, we really do need to establish how accurate our conviction rate is with fairly modern technology. Mixing convictions from different eras that have two vastly different accuracies muddles that a great deal. That 10% figure, while appalling, doesn't necessarily reflect the state of affairs today.
That said, modern convictions would have to be impressively accurate to even begin to offset the very good arguments against the death penalty.
Oct 29th, 2008 at 8:12am
I agree with your abti-capital punishment ad.
Mar 28th, 2009 at 3:13pm
A question or two.
Are we comparing apples to apples in the cost analysis? In other words, granting that a Death Penalty case is more expensive than a typical non-death penalty case is one thing but how much more expensive is it over the long haul than a Life Without Parole case? If the comparison suggests accurately that the death penalty is several times more expensive that would be the exact same case had life been sought I can see the comparison but if the average of non-death cases includes grafitti charges etal. it seems a bit of a shaky ground upon which to make an argument.
Moreover what percentage of individuals sentenced to a life term actually remain for the duration of their natural lives?