|
|
Death by Harsh Sentencing and Deliberate Indifference
As Washington Post columnist Colbert I. King rightly points out in a 2004 column, Jonathan Magbie's death four years ago was unlike those of so many other young, African-American men in Washington D.C. He wasn't gunned down or stabbed on the streets, it wasn't a house fire that prematurely ended his life and he didn't die in a car crash, though an accident he was in as a 4-year-old child left him paralyzed from the neck down.
No, the death of Magbie, 27, is a tragic story of systemic failures to care for the most vulnerable members of our society, and the horrendous potential ramifications of our society's rush to criminalize through illogical and arbitrary drug laws.
Magbie had never been convicted of any crime — he had absolutely no criminal record — when he was picked up in September 2004 for possessing a joint. He had a single marijuana cigarette, something Magbie said he sometimes smoked to alleviate the excruciating pain he was forced to endure as a result of a variety of maladies stemming from his paralysis. His arrest was only the beginning of a horrifying journey that would lead to Magbie dying while under the supposed watch of the D.C. government — alone, forgotten and uncared for.
Magbie's death could have and should have been prevented at any number of different junctures.
His life would have been spared had D.C. Superior Court Judge Judith E. Retchin chosen to give Magbie probation, the typical punishment for someone with no prior criminal record. Instead, saying that unless he spent time behind bars Magbie would continue to smoke marijuana to alleviate his pain, Retchin gave him a 10-day jail sentence despite the fact that D.C.'s Central Detention Facility didn't have a ventilator — something Magbie needed to be able to breathe properly while he slept at night. The day after his sentencing, a jail doctor called Retchin's law clerk to say that Magbie shouldn't be incarcerated given his overall medical condition. No matter: Magbie remained locked up.
Magbie's life would have been spared had jail doctors done a follow-up examination of Magbie, or if they had even managed to conduct their daily rounds to check on patients. Neither happened.
As a result, Magbie developed acute pneumonia which wasn't properly treated, he didn't receive necessary fluids or nutrition and he became severely dehydrated and malnourished. He slipped into acute respiratory crisis and died.
His absurd punishment of 10 days in jail had become a death sentence.
The ACLU National Prison Project this week announced the settlement of a wrongful death lawsuit filed on behalf of Magbie's mother and against a number of defendants, including D.C. officials. But even the "substantial" settlement won't bring Magbie back to life.
As Edward J. Connor, another attorney representing Ms. Scott, said, "we can only hope this settlement will help to ensure that nothing like this ever happens again."
We intend the comments portion of this blog to be a forum where you can freely express your views on blog postings and on comments made by other people. Given that, please understand that you are responsible for the material you post on the comments portion of this blog. The only postings that we ask that you refrain from posting and that we cannot permit on our website are requests for legal assistance and postings that could cause ACLU to incur legal liability.
One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites. We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published. Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section. 3 Responses to "Death by Harsh Sentencing and Deliberate Indifference" |
|
|
© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004 |
Dec 6th, 2008 at 2:43pm
That's appalling. What a disgrace. A judge decides to be a tough guy and teach a lesson to a paraplegic? How many people who have done so much worse are given probation? All kinds of scum walk the street because they had a good lawyer, but God help you if you are disabled. This person was trying to manage a debilitating medical condition. Instead of being referred to social services, he was left to die, negected and alone in a prison.
As for the marijauna, legalize, regulate & tax it already! At least for medical use, if nothing else.
Dec 6th, 2008 at 6:24pm
Oh my goodness! That is just so injust and horrendous! That judge should be disbarred for this post-haste before she effectively sentences another person to death over using one friggin joint to alleviate excruciating pain. Do people really expect people like Magbie to live life in pain?!
Dec 20th, 2008 at 11:34pm
Will, All:
It seems to me that Magbie's initial crime, such as it was, is really a red herring. That is, no matter for what he'd been sentenced, Magbie deserved better treatment and attention within the facility itself--regardless of whether it was one li'l ol' doobie that got him there or something far more opprobrious. Let's be frank: if he really was smoking for pain, then he probably was lucky that he was caught with only one joint. Let's "what if" for a moment, and propose that he'd been arrested just after buying a quarter--a supply which he might need even for just "occasional" relief. Does his death become any less problematic under these circumstances?
All that said, I don't mean to imply that you yourself think otherwise. But the negligence is so plain on the part of the court and the District that even if Magbie were caught smoking a blunt, and had two pocketfulls of "marijuana cigarettes," he still deserved better. I think it would take quite a bit of Mary Jane to balance out a death if we were going by any type of lex talionis, retributive, type of justice. (Of course, it can't be overlooked that the judge hoped to issue not a retributive sentence, or even a rehabilatative one, but a "preventive" one, hoping to get Magbie off the weed by sticking him in the pokey for ten days).
In any case, a good post. I hope all is well, and post up some more . . .
All the best,
DAJ
Nashville, TN