CategoriesJoin Us At:
|
U.S. Supreme Court Grants Review in School Strip Search CaseYou may have heard the infamous case of the 13-year-old girl who was strip-searched by school officials for allegedly possession ibuprofen (Advil). Perhaps as surprising as the strip search itself is today’s news that the U.S. Supreme Court has granted review in the case — meaning it will reconsider a lower court’s ruling that the student’s constitutional rights were violated. Which raises the question: If the constitution doesn’t protect 13-year-olds from being strip-searched at school for allegedly possessing Advil, who does the constitution protect? It’s hard to understand how the illegality of strip-searching Savana Redding is again up for debate. Consider the school’s case:
Tags: U.S. Supreme Court
We intend the comments portion of this blog to be a forum where you can freely express your views on blog postings and on comments made by other people. Given that, please understand that you are responsible for the material you post on the comments portion of this blog. The only postings that we ask that you refrain from posting and that we cannot permit on our website are requests for legal assistance and postings that could cause ACLU to incur legal liability.
One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites. We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published. Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section. 3 Responses to "U.S. Supreme Court Grants Review in School Strip Search Case" |
|
© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004 |
Jan 16th, 2009 at 11:40pm
Can you say 5 to 4 to reverse the most liberal court in the country.
Thank God Sandra Day O'conner is gone.
Jan 19th, 2009 at 2:19pm
Is it against the law and should it be prosecuted as a sex crime?
Apr 21st, 2009 at 2:16pm
If I would have found out one of my Children(Female or Male) was strip searched in School for ANY reason, The Persons involved had better PRAY that the Police get to them before i do! That IS a sex crime, and against a minor no less!!! A Strip search is done by Law-Enforcement for reasons of incarceration! NOT by a School because so-and-so said someone else gave them something.
You want my Child searched, Call me and I will do it in private! It is a sad, sad world that our Children arent safe in their own Schools. And now add in the School officials molesting Our Children(On School grounds and Durring School hours), strictly on here say and WITHOUT parental notification and presence!
OH HELL NO!!!