DOJ Watchdog Unit Investigates Torture Memo AuthorsThis weekend, Newsweek reported on an internal Department of Justice (DOJ) report concerning the conduct of senior lawyers who approved torture and other harsh interrogation tactics under the Bush administration. The DOJ’s watchdog unit is investigating whether legal advice penned by the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) “was consistent with the professional standards that apply to Department of Justice attorneys.” According to insiders, a draft of the report sharply criticizes the legal work of former top OLC officials under Bush — Jay Bybee and John Yoo. In light of these reports, Senate Majority Whip Richard J. Durbin (D-Ill.) and Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) called on the DOJ to release the findings. Yoo is now a law professor at the University of California at Berkeley, and Bybee was appointed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit by Former President Bush. If Attorney General Eric Holder accepts the findings, the report could be forwarded to state bar associations for possible disciplinary action. While we hope the report will be made public, the ACLU is also fighting for the disclosure of the still-secret memos that lawyers like Bybee and Yoo wrote. Yesterday, the government agreed to drop its request for a 90-day delay in our lawsuit seeking the torture memos written by Steven Bradbury, former head of the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel. The government instead agreed to a 30-day extension. We take this as a good sign. The public has waited long enough for the disclosure of these memos; they are crucial to the historical record. As Jameel Jaffer, director of the ACLU’s National Security Project pointed out in a McClatchy story last week, “questions about accountability and responsibility are the subject of public debate right now” and the release of the memos would allow the public to better understand the legal basis for the Bush administration's national security policies. Stay tuned for updates.
Tags: national security project
We intend the comments portion of this blog to be a forum where you can freely express your views on blog postings and on comments made by other people. Given that, please understand that you are responsible for the material you post on the comments portion of this blog. The only postings that we ask that you refrain from posting and that we cannot permit on our website are requests for legal assistance and postings that could cause ACLU to incur legal liability.
One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites. We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published. Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section. 1 Response to "DOJ Watchdog Unit Investigates Torture Memo Authors" |
|
© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004 |
Feb 19th, 2009 at 12:45am
IS IT POSSIBLE THAT MUKASEY LAID THE GROUNDWORK
FOR THE 'TAKE-DOWN' OF THE AMERICAN GESTAPO?
It was Michael Mukasey who requested the internal report that has exposed the politically-motivated legal opinions from the Gozales-led Bush DOJ that attempted to legalize various forms of torture...
INCLUDING, as this writer has reported, the covert "use" of radiation weaponry on "innocent but targeted" U.S. citizens, APPROVED by the Gonzales-Bush-Cheney DOJ...
... in a STILL-ONGOING campaign that can be described as not just "torture," but a "slow-kill" American genocide/politicide.
Indeed, some have asked: Was that "fainting spell" before the Federalist Society late last year really a "directed energy (read: microwave radiation) weapon" attack on the attorney general -- a no-so-veiled "warning" for him to stay in line?
Now that the truth is coming out, will Mukasey fully reclaim his honor and tell all he knows about the "silent holocaust" that was vastly expanded under this predecessor -- institutionalized American crimes against humanity that continue to infect law enforcement agencies on the federal, state and local levels?
http://www.nowpublic.com/world/gestapo-usa-govt-funded- vigilante-network-targets-terrorizes-u-s-citizens
http://www.no wpublic.com/world/domestic-torture-radiation-weaponry-americas-horrifi c-shame
OR (if link is disabled):
http://My.NowPublic.com/scrivener