State Secrets Privilege: Beware of Blunt ObjectsLast month, the Obama Justice Department filed a brief asking the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals for a full panel (or "en banc") hearing of the ACLU's extraordinary rendition case against Boeing subsidiary Jeppesen Dataplan. This filing was in response to the ACLU's victory in April, when a three-judge panel of the appeals court reversed (PDF) a district court’s dismissal of the lawsuit after the government intervened and improperly asserted the "state secrets" privilege. Today, we filed a brief opposing a rehearing of the case. In the brief, we argue: [T]he government’s [assertion of the state secrets privilege] amounts to a demand that “the Judiciary should effectively cordon off all secret government actions from judicial scrutiny, immunizing the CIA and its partners from the demands and limits of the law.” The panel rightly rejected this limitless demand for immunity.We think it's about time that our plaintiffs, the victims of illegal kidnapping and torture, had their day in court. It's also about time for the Obama administration to live up to its promises of transparency, and use the state secrets privilege with greater precision and discretion.
We intend the comments portion of this blog to be a forum where you can freely express your views on blog postings and on comments made by other people. Given that, please understand that you are responsible for the material you post on the comments portion of this blog. The only postings that we ask that you refrain from posting and that we cannot permit on our website are requests for legal assistance and postings that could cause ACLU to incur legal liability.
One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites. We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published. Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section. 6 Responses to "State Secrets Privilege: Beware of Blunt Objects" |
|
© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004 |
Jul 7th, 2009 at 4:43am
nice discussion
Jul 8th, 2009 at 5:28am
We have a government hiding behind the "state secrets privilege", while certain agencies act with impunity. Fascism has come to America.
Jul 8th, 2009 at 11:41am
When will the ACLU realize that torture and extrajudicial targeting and punishment have been DOMESTICALLY institutionalized...
...an extrajudicial bypass that ACLU IGNORES in favor of campaigning against the torture of a few hundred detainees.
Torture, American-style is a DOMESTIC affair:
• A nationwide army of "community stalking" citizen vigilantes hiding behind federally-funded volunteer organizations -- using covertly implanted GPS tracking devices to stalk, harass, vandalize and terrorize unjustly "targeted" citizens and families;
• Deployment of classified "directed energy" microwave radiation weaponry to jurisdictions nationwide -- weapons that victims of "community gang stalking" claim are used to torture and physically degrade "undesirables";
• Multi-agency "programs of personal destruction" -- ranging from pervasive spying to a parallel system of transaction processing that victims maintain amounts to fascistic theft by deception.
These rogue programs must be taken down to preserve the rule of law in America.
Immediately. Before more damage is done.
The agencies of government that are commandeering this devolution of American democracy must be reined in and reformed, top to bottom, never again to subvert the rule of law.
http://nowpublic.com/world/gestapo-usa-govt-funded-vigilan te-network-terrorizes-america
OR (if link is corrupted / disabled):
http://My.NowPublic.com/scrivener
Jul 8th, 2009 at 4:21pm
Something's seriously wrong when good, patriotic, law-abiding, even "WASPy" Anericans are targeted for harassment by what can only be agencies of the state. And let me be clear, this "targeting" shouldn't happen to anyone.
what in the hell is going on?? Is it COINTELPRO? Some Machiavellian operation directed by the NSA (which hides it's activities until "outed" by a whistleblower, whom the NSA then systematically discredits by calling them crazy)?
This madness has got to stop and the ACLU needs to get with "the program" - no pun intended, and help bring this mess to the fore. Failing action on the part of the ACLU or a brave whistleblower, we're all screwed (some sooner than later, but all of us, ultimately).
Jul 20th, 2009 at 1:35pm
I COME FROM AN ITALIAN IMIGRANT FAMILY, I AM TIRED OF THE ACLU NOT STICKING UP FOR ALL AMERICANS AND NON AMERICANS WHY IS THE ACLU SILIENT ON THE CAPTURED AMERICAN SOLDIER HE IS A YOUNG AMERICAN AND IN DIRE NEED OF HELP THE PEOPLE THAT ARE HOLDING HIM CUT PEOPLES HEADS OFF HE IS IN GRAVE DANGER DO OR SAY SOMETHING TO HELP HIM OR SHUT UP ON YOUR TORTURE ISSUES
Jul 20th, 2009 at 1:39pm
WHAT DOES THE STATMENT MEAN YOUR COMMENT IS AWAITING MODERATION WHAT HAPPENED TO FREE SPEACH