Categories
Join Us At:
|
Congressmen: Pass ID Threatens AmericansIt's not every day that privacy advocates agree with this particular group of four congressmen. But in Tuesday's Washington Post, Congressmen Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), Lamar Smith (R-Texas), Jim Sensenbrenner (R-Wisc.) and Peter King (R-N.Y.) spoke out against PASS ID as a threat to our national security. We concur: PASS ID does present unnecessary risk, all while doing nothing to aid national security. Unfortunately, once you get past the headline, our agreement pretty much ends. The four congressmen are actually supporters of the failed Real ID Act — Rep. Sensenbrenner is the act's author. They oppose PASS ID because they feel it weakens some of Real ID's more draconian requirements.But the PASS ID Act is no benign alternative. It exposes Americans to an increased risk of identity theft, endangers victims of domestic violence, and cuts off religious minorities and some legal immigrants from full participation in society. For four congressmen who participated in the creation of the Real ID Act, their memory on the matter seems a bit fuzzy. The original Real ID Act, H.R. 418 in the 109th Congress, stalled in Senate committee and had to be added to H.R. 1268, the must-pass Tsunami Relief Package, to be enacted. The four back their assertion that Real ID is working by noting that 16 states "are complying with benchmarks set by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) or are on track to comply by the end of this year." Sounds great, except the problem is there are 50 states and the rest are not complying. DHS Secretary Napolitano testified at a hearing last week that no states were expected to be in compliance with the benchmarks by the set deadline, there are currently 24 states on record against complying with Real ID, and more are working to join them. Given the lengths PASS ID goes to imitate Real ID, we're honestly surprised that there can be objections labeling PASS ID too soft on terrorists. In any event, the important thing is that the ACLU and congressmen Smith, Sensenbrenner, King, and Issa can stand together and oppose PASS ID on its merits.
We intend the comments portion of this blog to be a forum where you can freely express your views on blog postings and on comments made by other people. Given that, please understand that you are responsible for the material you post on the comments portion of this blog. The only postings that we ask that you refrain from posting and that we cannot permit on our website are requests for legal assistance and postings that could cause ACLU to incur legal liability.
One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites. We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published. Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section. 2 Responses to "Congressmen: Pass ID Threatens Americans" |
|
|
© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004 |
Jul 23rd, 2009 at 2:35pm
I'D LIKE TO KNOW IF SOMEOBNE TH UNITED STATE GOVERMENT VIOLATED UNDER PATRIOT ACT . WHAT TAHT INDIVIDUALS CAN DO
Jul 25th, 2009 at 9:13am
This National ID argument is getting to sound like the joke about Republicans: "The folks who believe nothing should ever be done for the first time." Whatever the reason of the day may be, the fact is we really do need to know, with certainty, who we all are. Lots of money is already being lost by individuals and institutions are already spending huge amounts to try to protect our identities - but we still only allow ourselves to use cast iron tools to do it. Other countries can do it right and there is no public outrage about it. The cost of doing it that is bantered about is nonsense; it comprises every worst case the propaganda taskforce can think of and then evaluated as though every possible problem would be typical. Whatever problems really do exist won't be solved until we start doing it and failing to start because we don't like those start-up problems is just a circular excuse. What I hate most is that the ACLU's reaction to it all is just a "knee jerk." "This smells like a personal liberty issue so we're against it." The ACLU does mostly really great work, but it really would be refreshing if you did not fall for "motherhood" issues quite so hard all the time and, instead, tried to see that we are no longer living is a country where the old ID's are good enough any more than we can still do business with a handshake. It is not just an immigrant problem; that is just the current political excuse to get this ball rolling - but it does need to get rolling. PLEASE?