www.aclu.orgJOIN THE ACLUTAKE ACTIONABOUT US
ACLU Blog of Rights - Official Blog of the ACLU National Office American Civil Liberties Union Homepage Blog of Rights Homepage Support the ACLU
Sep 23rd, 2009
Posted by Suzanne Ito, ACLU at 3:02pm

New State Secrets Policy: Like the Fox Guarding the Henhouse

Months after Attorney General Eric Holder said he would release the Obama administration's new policy on the use of the state secrets privilege, it's finally out. The thrust of the new rule: Holder must approve any invocation of the privilege.

Well, that's not much different from the Bush administration's policy, which was to invoke the privilege at the outset, before the case even got its foot in the courthouse door.

Ben Wizner, staff attorney with the ACLU National Security Project, filed two cases challenging the CIA's extraordinary rendition program. In the first case, brought on behalf of Khaled el-Masri, the district court and appeals court both accepted the government's state secrets claim, and the Supreme Court refused to hear the case. In the second case brought against Boeing subsidiary Jeppesen Dataplan, the district court sided with the government when it invoked the state secrets privilege, but the appeals court reversed that decision. The DOJ is now asking the appeals court to rehear the case en banc, or before a full panel of judges. Ben said in a statement today:

On paper, this is a step forward. In court however, the Obama administration continues to defend a broader view of state secrets put forward by the Bush administration and to demand that federal courts throw out lawsuits filed by victims of torture and illegal surveillance. In recent years, we have seen the executive branch engage in grave human rights violations, declare those activities 'state secrets,' and thus avoid any judicial oversight or accountability. It is critical that the courts play a meaningful role in deciding whether victims of human rights abuse will have an opportunity to seek justice. Real reform of the state secrets privilege must affirm the power of the courts to reject false claims of 'national security.'

Real reform must start in Congress. House and Senate bills were introduced a few days after DOJ lawyers invoked the state secrets privilege before the 9th Circuit in our Jeppesen case. Coincidence? We hope not. It's time for Congress to reassert its role as a check on executive power. Without state secrets legislation, we'll only have more secrecy and less accountability.

 

Tags: Khaled el-Masri, Rendition

We intend the comments portion of this blog to be a forum where you can freely express your views on blog postings and on comments made by other people. Given that, please understand that you are responsible for the material you post on the comments portion of this blog. The only postings that we ask that you refrain from posting and that we cannot permit on our website are requests for legal assistance and postings that could cause ACLU to incur legal liability.

One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites.

We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published.

Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section.

1 Response to "New State Secrets Policy: Like the Fox Guarding the Henhouse"

  1. Torture in Dearborn Mi Says:

    Learning Disabled Woman Tortured in Dearborn Mi/Governement Police CoverUp:
    Fellow Michigan Taxpayer's/Concerned citizen's

    The Post I posted at 1:53:43 Pm today was to be continued in the next Post that was piosted at 2:01:03 Pm it was continued but thru cyberstalking a pertinient part of this continuation was erased by the Governemt thru their monitoring of my post's so I will continue it know it is in direct reference to The key that was stolen out of a Letter that was mailed to Geoffrey Fiegar from a Place in Dearborn/this palce has and is a place were Gang Stalking tactic's were usede and are stioll currently being used to this date and time.
    This key that was mailed to Mr Fiegar was not in a reply enevelope from Mr Fieagr when he replyed to the letter/subsequently this key and actually also a FBI Visitor's badge that was also not returned with the letter that was mailed to Mr Fiegar the key eneded up in the people from MacArhtur Street
    See next post for Continuation
    09/23/2009 3:54:31 p.m. EDT
    Recommend New post Reply to this Post Report Abuse
    09/23/2009 4:21:59 p.m. EDT
    Learning Disabled Woman Tortured in Dearborn/Micgan Governement Cover Up /Police Cover UpSee a copy of the Timeline of Torture was in this U Haul storage unit:So the people on MacArthur were used to get it out by saying that U haul called them and offered for them to get out the victim's stuff after she went to Tennesse.See On The ACLU website they have a Page literally Dedicated to how fhe Governement uses Buisness's in the community to assist inSurvallance and for informant need's of the Govrnmnt in reference to a person who visit a BuisnessThe Govrnmnt uses these buisness thru slander campaighn's that the victim frequent's to aid and abbed in their endeavor's depending on what the Govrnmnt's need's are.Then the timeline was taken out of this storage facilllity and her property was held hostage as a bait of future enticement of trauma using her property as a tool of Your losing your property again is in your face" solicited by us:They kept solicitation alive by things they created .

Comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
 

© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004
This is the Web site of the American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU Foundation.
Learn more about the distinction between these two components of the ACLU.

User Agreement | Privacy Statement | FAQs | Site Map

Statistics image