|
|
From Seattle to Clarkston: Why Voters Should Approve Ref. 71Like a lot of Washingtonians, I was holding my breath hoping that Protect Marriage Washington wouldn’t gather enough signatures to put the new domestic partnership law up to a popular vote. But then on September 2nd, the signature count was certified and so in November, those voters committed enough go to the polls on an off-year election will be asked to vote on whether to approve the domestic partnership law passed earlier this year by Washington’s legislature. As someone who was born and raised in Washington (Olympia, to be specific, the state capital and home of some pretty amazing riot grrrl rock bands), I wanted to help out my home state on efforts to pass the referendum and keep domestic partnerships. Coordinating with the Approve Referendum 71 Campaign, I began a state-wide search for the domestic partners with the most compelling stories – stories that could educate voters about the important benefits and protections provided by domestic partnerships. It’s hard not to be moved to support domestic partnerships when you hear Rose and Joe, a straight senior couple who live in the far northeast part of the state, talk about how their domestic partnership helps them cope with Rose’s medical issues. It’s hard to question the service gay and lesbian couples provide to our communities when you listen to Cindy and Janet talk about the six kids they adopted from foster care. And I challenge you not to cry when you hear Cathlin and her partner Avril speak about the uncertainties they face with Cathlin’s cancer treatments. You can watch videos of more Washington couples here: http://approvereferendum71.org/r71-personal-stories/ If you have friends in Washington, please remind them to vote to Approve Referendum 71 on November 3rd. And if you have a few bucks to spare, please take the opportunity to support the Approve Ref. 71 Campaign. To learn more, visit Get Busy Get Equal. Tags: marriage
We intend the comments portion of this blog to be a forum where you can freely express your views on blog postings and on comments made by other people. Given that, please understand that you are responsible for the material you post on the comments portion of this blog. The only postings that we ask that you refrain from posting and that we cannot permit on our website are requests for legal assistance and postings that could cause ACLU to incur legal liability.
One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites. We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published. Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section. 4 Responses to "From Seattle to Clarkston: Why Voters Should Approve Ref. 71" |
|
|
© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004 |
Oct 22nd, 2009 at 6:28pm
I am sick of your continued efforts to rip out everything this country was founded upon. The most sickening is your support of same sex marriages, taking down all the crosses on American military grave sites and eliminating prayer oveer American grave sites.
What should be outlawed is the ACLU.
Oct 24th, 2009 at 1:17pm
The bigots love to talk about family values but it is people like Avril and Cathlin who actualy live true family values.I also think that those kids in the photo won't be thinking of suicide if they find themselves in love with someone of their own gender.I just wish we could sat the same of the children of the bigots.
Oct 27th, 2009 at 11:32am
Jerry, please check your sources before you display your ignorance. Any opinion you may offer concerning same sex marriage is nullified by your errors in accusing the ACLU of removing personal religious symbols and prayer from military grave sites. I personally think the ACLU is doing great work.
Oct 27th, 2009 at 4:50pm
I am wondering just who it was that told Mr. Jerry the outrageous LIE above that ACLU was seeking to eliminate prayer over American grave sites, or taking down all the crosses on American military grave sites. Whoever it was, he or she didn't know their butt from buckshot.