Blog of Rights

Amanda
Simon

Fusion Centers: Mysteries Wrapped in Enigmas of Horrible, Horrible Privacy Risks

By Amanda Simon at 4:11pm

Two of the ACLU's brightest stars on privacy and law enforcement, Jay Stanley and Mike German, wrote a great report last year entitled "What's Wrong with Fusion Centers?" that outlined, well, what's wrong with fusion centers. Fusion centers — also known as one-stop shopping for identity thieves — were brought about in a post-9/11 effort to get federal and local law enforcement talking to each other.

Salon Tackles Surveillance, Irony and Tote Bags

By Amanda Simon at 5:06pm

Salon's Tim Shorrock posted a pretty interesting story today on a "movement" to investigate the abuses of the Bush Administration – an investigation based largely on the Church Committee.  Clearly I've linked to some background info on the Church Committee but if you're disinclined to follow that link, you should know right off the bat that the Church Committee scrutinized the abuses of the Nixon Administration and those before it, the end result being the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978.  Yes.  That one.

Holy Relevancy, Batman

By Amanda Simon at 12:56pm

If you’re like the ACLU you believe in privacy, the Fourth Amendment and the fact that Congress just did an unforgivable thing to both by passing the FISA Amendments Act of 2008. And, if you are like me and a few others I know, then you spent last week anticipating then reveling in the release of The Dark Knight. If you’re with me on all of those counts, then you probably found a particular scene in the latest Batman to be as timely as I did.

Mac and Cheese, PB and J, Privacy and Free Speech...

By Amanda Simon at 11:06am

George Washington University law professor Jonathon Turley was on WNYC last week giving us props for filing our FISA lawsuit. He also got into an issue that hasn't had much play yet but certainly will - how journalists and their work will be affected. We at the ACLU already knew that as more than one of our clients is a journalist (in fact, read Chris Hedges' fantastic piece in the Los Angeles Times from last week). Ah, the merging of two of my favorite issues - FISA and protecting the public's right to know.

FISA Vote, or How I Lost Complete Faith in Our Legislative Branch

By Amanda Simon at 12:14pm

Today's the day, folks. Start dialing your international calls now while you still have some assurance of privacy.

Reid came on the floor and set up the rules. Debate will continue then votes on the amendments — Dodd, then Specter, then Bingaman.

FISA Debate: The Senate Has Nearly Sucked Out My Soul.

By Amanda Simon at 7:47pm

It’s been a long day so here’s a quick highlight reel from the last few hours:

  • Senator Specter introduced his immunity amendment.
  • Senator Whitehouse spoke against immunity and described the whole situation as the Bush Administration’s “self-inflicted wound.” Nice.
  • Senator Levin spoke in favor of the Bingaman amendment, too. Makes me proud to be from Michigan.
  • Senator Chambliss read his speech (for the bill, not shockingly) as quickly and as free from emotion as possible. It was like he was presenting a book report.
Seriously, if one more senator talks about the need for immunity for future cooperation, I’m going to throw my computer out the window. For the 582nd time, FISA requires that telecommunications be legally compelled to hand over information if the proper legal requirements are met. Remember Feingold’s speech this morning?

FISA Debate — Break's Over.

By Amanda Simon at 4:17pm

Debate begins again. Senator Bond is on the floor once again saying plainly and, frankly a little smugly, that the FISA Amendments Act is the Senate bill with "cosmetic" fixes for the Democrats. Boasting is unattractive, Senator Bond. (BTW, why can no one in Congress pronounce "exigent" properly? Does that make you feel confident about their ability to discuss and legislate on these intricate matters? Me, neither.)

FISA Debate. Day 4,392. Ever see Groundhog Day?

By Amanda Simon at 1:03pm

Yeah, me too. Ever lived it?

The Senate is taking up the FISA Amendments Act once again. Today they'll be debating it on the floor and then they'll vote tomorrow morning. Listen. It doesn't look good. Here's a quick rundown of the first bit of debate.

Senator Cardin spoke first then Senator Feingold came to the floor giving Senator Dodd props on his immunity work. He called the immunity provision a "rigged process" thereby cementing his place in my heart. Feingold also notes that at least 70 senators have not seen the documents outlining the legal underpinnings of the program that the Intelligence and Judiciary committees have had access to.

FISA Debate III - Cloture's Coming...

By Amanda Simon at 5:52pm

Wyden's on the floor. God love ‘im. Says the president's wiretapping program was built on "legal quicksand." Coming from one of the very few people who have actually seen the Office of Legal Opinion memos, that's quite a statement. He also says the administration "overreached and had fallen short." Nice wordplay, sir!

Dodd is reminding everyone that this vote will go down in history. I'm not sure his colleagues can hear that enough. Now he's talking about the amendment Feingold and he will offer to strip immunity. That man's got immunity in his teeth and he's not letting go.

Now the Senate Hits FISA - Debate, Part II

By Amanda Simon at 3:35pm

Leahy and Bond just spoke. Not to be predictable, but a big fist bump (terrorist fist jab?) to Leahy and an exasperated head shake to Bond. In his first of what will likely be many victory laps, Bond told us the process of getting this bill has "accomplished its goal." If "its goal" is the making sure the White House has zero accountability and congressionally-sanctioned domestic spying then YES, it has accomplished its goal. Well done, Kit.

Statistics image