Blog of Rights

Nicole
Kief
  • 1
  • 2
  • Next Page

Not Another Voter Disfranchisement Movie

By Nicole Kief, ACLU at 3:08pm

(Originally posted on Daily Kos.)

This election season, untold numbers of eligible voters are at serious risk of being denied access to the polls. Are unfair and unnecessary voter ID laws to blame? Is it because their houses are under foreclosure and their registrations are being challenged? Yes. But there's more: the poor administration of felony and misdemeanor disfranchisement laws across the country.

Protecting Small 'D' Democracy and the Right to Vote

By Nicole Kief, ACLU at 4:07pm

(Originally posted on Pam's House Blend).

Isn't the right to vote freely for a candidate of your choosing just that: the right to vote freely for a candidate of your choosing?

Not according to one Virginia legislator, who seemed to forget the whole principle of small "d" democracy when he characterized efforts to educate people with felony convictions about their right to vote as a big "D" Democratic conspiracy. "I don' t know a lot of young Republicans who end up being felons," C. Todd Gilbert told The Washington Post. "Clearly the groups that are soliciting these felons to get their rights restored are predisposed to be in support of Obama, and I am sure this registration effort is designed to help their candidate."

Be Here, Behave, Be Learning -- Be Sued

By Nicole Kief, ACLU at 4:46pm

Lawsuits certainly have a knack for bringing people-and information-out of the woodworks.

In March, the ACLU Racial Justice Program and ACLU of Georgia filed a lawsuit against the Atlanta Independent School System (AISS) and Community Education Partners (CEP), the for-profit company contracted since 2002 to run AISS's disciplinary alternative school to the tune of almost $7 million a year. The lawsuit accuses the school-whose motto, if you can believe it, is 'Be Here, Behave, Be Learning'-of violating students' constitutional rights to an adequate public education, to be free from unreasonable searches, and to due process when referred to and disciplined at the school. Just some of the fun facts in the case include students being subject to pat-down searches on a daily basis, a prohibition on bringing anything into or out of the school (including keys, combs, pencils, paper, tampons and books), a no homework policy, and a police officer who slammed an innocent student's head into the wall hard enough that his mother-who was not notified of the incident by the school-had to take him to the hospital.

The AISS-CEP school is yet another example of the school-to-prison pipeline, a national phenomenon that funnels youth of color out of classrooms and into prisons (or prison-like schools) by treating them as dangerous criminals in need of containment rather than students worthy of instruction. The school is also, as a new article by Creative Loafing (Atlanta's alternative weekly) explains, a product of Republican educational policy, which has favored discipline, privatization, and test-based accountability. CEP's success, the article suggests, is due not to its capacity to educate youth, but to its ability to use its political ties to win contracts from Texas to Florida to Philadelphia. It should come as no surprise, then, that CEP's contract in Atlanta was renewed until 2009 shortly after CEP leadership made campaign contributions to four individuals running for the Atlanta Board of Education.

Since the ACLU filed its lawsuit, CEP's failure to educate students has become a hot topic, and people familiar with the school-from parents to former administrators-have begun to speak out. In addition to the Creative Loafing story, the Atlanta Journal Constitution has published three articles (available here, here and here), NPR covered the issue, the Atlanta Voice and Atlanta Progressive News both ran stories, and a post appeared on Daily Kos. Let's hope the media spotlight continues to show who is truly misbehaving.

Georgia Erroneously Purges Eligible Voters

By Nicole Kief, ACLU at 11:55am
In late March, Georgia's Columbus-Muscogee County Elections & Registration Office mailed out upwards of 700 letters informing voters they had become ineligible to vote because they had been convicted of felonies. The problem? A potentially large number of them hadn't been.

As in 47 other states across

Equal Opportunity Foes in Oklahoma Move to Pull Own Petition, Calling It a Waste

By Nicole Kief, ACLU at 11:29am
Equal opportunity foes were dealt a blow last Friday when the proponents of an anti-affirmative action initiative in Oklahoma filed a motion to withdraw their own proposal, stating that the measure likely did not have enough valid signatures to make it onto the ballot.

Proponents of the so-called Oklahoma Civil Rights Initiative (OKCRI)-backed by millionaire California businessman Ward Connerly and his so-called American Civil Rights Institute-were put on the defensive when local civil rights advocates, in collaboration with the American Civil Liberties Union and the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, began looking into the OKCRI's fishy signature-gathering process earlier this year.

Connerly and his cronies have a history of using devious tactics to thwart the democratic process. Their strategy to deceive voters through misleading ballot language and signature-gathering practices got them in hot water in federal court in Michigan, and voters in Colorado have accused the ACRI of lying about the intent of a current initiative. As a result, civil rights groups have been watching Connerly's associates closely in Oklahoma, Colorado, Nebraska, Arizona and Missouri, where they are using the same dirty tricks to place similar initiatives on the ballot this fall.

In Oklahoma, after reviewing the signatures submitted in favor of the OKCRI, the Secretary of State identified an unprecedented number of serious irregularities, including numerous duplicate names and addresses and instances of petitioners signing their own signature sheets multiple times. Faced with a legal challenge to the signatures by the ACLU and NAACP LDF, OKCRI proponents moved to withdraw the initiative altogether, stating that they do not want to 'waste [the] Court's efforts nor taxpayer money...when [they] are reasonably certain that [the initiative] will fail to garner to requisite number of signatures.'

Given that these initiatives rely on deception to garner support, it's no surprise that a serious investigation has the proponents running scared. Voters in each state where equal opportunity is under attack must hold Connerly and his allies accountable and ensure that the truth is brought to light.

To learn more about the importance of affirmative action, visit www.aclu.org/racialjustice/aa. For information about the ACLU's work on women's rights, visit www.aclu.org/womenshistory.

-By Ana Weibgen and Nicole Kief

  • 1
  • 2
  • Next Page
Statistics image