Blog of Rights

Tanya
Greene
Tanya Greene’s work focuses on criminal justice issues, including the death penalty, indigent defense, solitary confinement and juvenile justice. Greene worked as a capital defense practitioner for almost 15 years prior to joining the ACLU.
 
She began at the Southern Center for Human Rights, representing indigent capital clients in Alabama, Georgia and Mississippi. Greene then worked as a Deputy Capital Defender at the New York Capital Defender Office where she represented capitally charged clients in the New York City area.  The New York Capital Defender Office was instrumental in having the New York death penalty statute declared unconstitutional in 2004.  Subsequently, Greene served as the Training and Assistance Counsel for the National Consortium for Capital Defense Training where she developed innovative training and consulted with capital defense practitioners on cases nationwide.
 
Greene received her J.D. from Harvard Law School after graduating from Wesleyan University with a double major in Sociology and Afro-American Studies.  Greene is an active member of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers and the National Conference of Black Lawyers; she serves on the Board of Directors of the Gulf Region Advocacy Center, a death penalty non-profit in Houston, Texas.

Choosing Death Over Life: (Still) Starving to Stop Solitary

By Rebecca McCray, ACLU Criminal Law Reform Project & Tanya Greene, Advocacy and Policy Counsel, ACLU at 10:33am

UPDATE: Although it appears that the hunger strike is over, the problems with solitary confinement remain. Not only are these conditions inhumane and harmful, but they also jeopardize public safety.

The End of the Line for Troy Davis?

By Tanya Greene, Advocacy and Policy Counsel, ACLU at 6:11pm

Troy Davis is probably innocent.

Probably innocent — is that the standard we now use to justify executing people?

Last week, the United States Supreme Court ended any real chance Davis had that the courts would stop his execution. He is now at the end of the road, and the state of Georgia could set a new date for his execution at any moment. The last time he had an execution date, in a highly unusual move, the Supreme Court agreed to hear his case just two hours before the execution. But this time, if he gets two hours from execution again, there will probably be no stay.

Wither the Death Penalty! First in 2011 — Illinois. Is Maryland Next?

By Tanya Greene, Advocacy and Policy Counsel, ACLU at 6:19pm

One more down, fewer to go! By taking the historic step of signing into law last week a repeal of the death penalty in Illinois, Gov. Patrick Quinn lent further momentum to efforts in other states across the country to abolish state-sanctioned killings.

Long plagued with flaws including the sentencing to death of 20 people who were later freed after being found to be innocent, racial bias, rampant legal errors and law enforcement, attorney and court misconduct and incompetence that besieged the capital prosecution system, Illinois' death penalty system had to go.

25 Years After McCleskey, Looking Forward to Legislative Fixes of Supreme Court Error

By Tanya Greene, Advocacy and Policy Counsel, ACLU at 9:54am

April 22 marks the 25th anniversary of the Supreme Court decision in McCleskey v. Kemp, in which the Court ruled that a defendant cannot rely upon statistical evidence of systemic racial bias to prove his death sentence unconstitutional, no matter how strong that evidence may be. McCleskey has been roundly condemned as a low point in the quest for equality that begs to be revisited. To mark the occasion, every day this week the ACLU Blog of Rights will feature a new post about McCleskey and its legacy. You can read all the posts here, and visit mccleskeyvkemp.com to learn more.

Tightening Belts Means Loosening Restraints: Illinois to Close Supermax Prison

By Tanya Greene, Advocacy and Policy Counsel, ACLU at 11:00am

One of the more positive things to result from deteriorating state budgets across the nation is that some state lawmakers are looking to smart criminal justice reform as a way to trim budgets. Whether motivated by cost savings or human rights, these changes are an important step toward a more humane justice system. One such change began yesterday in Illinois, where Gov. Patrick Quinn announced a budget plan that includes closing the state's Tamms Correctional Center — reportedly saving $21.6 million in the upcoming fiscal year and $26.6 million annually thereafter.

Thanksgiving on Oregon's Death Row

By Tanya Greene, Advocacy and Policy Counsel, ACLU at 1:47pm

Join the ACLU in thanking Oregon Gov. John Kitzhaber for issuing a moratorium on all executions in the state.

Murder Victims' Families Say No to More Killing

By Tanya Greene, Advocacy and Policy Counsel, ACLU at 3:23pm

We heard a lot last week about the MacPhail family who wanted Troy Davis killed despite his innocence. But what about the loved ones of murder victims who oppose the death penalty?

Why haven't we heard many, if any, media accounts from James Anderson's family? Mr. Anderson, a black man, was allegedly run over by a truck driven by Deryl Dedmon, a white teenager, in Mississippi this past summer. Barbara Anderson Young, Mr. Anderson's sister, wrote a letter to the local District Attorney on behalf of their family indicating the family's opposition to the death penalty, which is "deeply rooted in our religious faith, a faith that was central in James' life as well." The letter also eloquently asks that Dedmon be spared execution because the death penalty "historically has been used in Mississippi and the South primarily against people of color for killing whites." It continues, "[e]xecuting James' killers will not help balance the scales. But sparing them may help to spark a dialogue that one day will lead to the elimination of capital punishment." Why isn't more of a big deal made about families of murder victims' of horrific crimes — there is disturbing video of Mr. Anderson's beating and death — who do not believe state-sponsored murder is the right answer?

Another Death Row Inmate Freed Due to Innocence – And Another Unsolved Case

By Tanya Greene, Advocacy and Policy Counsel, ACLU at 4:20pm

Twenty years ago, teenagers Damien Echols, Jason Baldwin and Jessie Misskelley were the talk of the Memphis tristate area as they stood accused of brutally killing three little Boy Scouts. Folks seemed particularly titillated by the news reports and rumors of Satanism and struck by Damien's devilish name (remember Damien from The Omen?), wiccan connections and alleged "evil-worship." As a lawyer-to-be at the time, I was troubled by the frame-up feel of the case against poor boys from the wrong side of the tracks, the rush to justice and spectacularly shaky "evidence," alarmist media coverage and shocking trial testimony. Ultimately, Baldwin and Misskelley were sentenced to life in prison; Echols was sentenced to die in the electric chair. Years later, as a young criminal defense lawyer in the South, I was involved in legal research and investigation on the case as the HBO movies were being made.

Life Without a Chance

By Tanya Greene, Advocacy and Policy Counsel, ACLU at 2:06pm

We as a nation need to stop throwing away our children. Kids are still maturing and developing — as I like to say, they are not done yet. As a result, society treats kids and adults differently in a wide array of contexts: kids cannot drive, sit on juries, enter contracts, join the military, smoke, drink, marry or hold political office. Yet we lock them up and literally throw away the key.  Making matters worse, we condemn black youth forever at 18 times the rate of white youth and Latino youth at five times the rate of whites.

Unlikely Allies and Their Arguments

By Tanya Greene, Advocacy and Policy Counsel, ACLU at 5:54pm

When the famous author (and lawyer) Scott Turow was chosen in 2000 to participate in a commission reviewing the Illinois death penalty, he was on the fence about the death penalty because of his concern that some crimes deserved no other punishment than death. After two years of studying the death penalty, however, Turow became convinced that some of the most powerful arguments against the death penalty were rooted in traditionally conservative values and he grew to strongly support them. This finding supports an assertion we've long believed: opposition to the death penalty isn't a conservative v. liberal argument. It's unfair, and, as Turow ultimately describes it, un-American.

Statistics image