CategoriesJoin Us At:
|
Commission Hears Testimony Against Death Penalty
In a new YouTube video released yesterday, Aundré Herron talks about why California’s death penalty has to go. As both a former prosecutor and murder victim survivor, Herron has a unique and incisive perspective on the death penalty, which she shared with the California Commission on the Fair Administration of Justice. Watch her testimony.
Herron commented that she empathizes with the desire to seek revenge, but still understands that the death penalty is broken and can never be fixed. Her testimony surprised the Commission and got members to take notice of the growing number of victim survivors who are speaking out against the death penalty. At the hearing, several other murder victim family members spoke, explaining their stories and their reasons for opposing the death penalty. Among other things, they said that the death penalty does nothing to heal their pain and that it only diverts resources from programs that could help them, as well as from solving and prosecuting other serious crimes. These stories and perspectives are included in a new publication, Voices from California Crime Victims for Alternatives to the Death Penalty. The California Commission on the Fair Administration of Justice is preparing for its third and final public hearing on California’s broken death penalty, to be held March 28th at Santa Clara University. At hearings in January and February, the Commission heard about other problems with California’s death penalty, including racial and geographic disparities in death sentencing, the lack of well qualified defense attorneys, and the lack of transparency and accountability for local prosecutors. The Commission will hear evidence of further problems at its final hearing.
|
|
© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004 |
One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites.
We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published.
Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section.