CategoriesJoin Us At:
|
Former Execution Volunteer Joins ACLU Lethal Injection Suit
On October 15, 2007, the State of Nevada was set to execute by lethal injection death-row inmate William Castillo, who had abandoned his appeals and volunteered for execution. In late September, the Supreme Court had agreed to hear the case Baze v. Rees, to decide the constitutionality of Kentucky's lethal injection protocol.
Attempting to prevent Nevada from carrying out an execution that would violate the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment, the ACLU's Nevada affiliate, working in conjunction with the Capital Punishment Project, filed an action in the Nevada Supreme Court resulting in the stay of all executions in Nevada. The stay was entered only 90 minutes before Castillo's scheduled execution. Castillo has now changed his mind about volunteering for execution and, on May 7, 2008, joined in the ACLU's challenge of Nevada's lethal injection execution procedure. Castillo's attorneys have argued that the case should be sent back to a lower court for a hearing to get details the high court needs to "fully address the constitutionality" of Nevada's execution protocol. Lee Rowland of the Nevada ACLU argued the case in the Nevada Supreme Court. 'We're very glad that our lawsuit gave Mr. Castillo the time to reconsider and decide not to volunteer for the death penalty," she said. The lawsuit comes at a time when the ACLU's National Prison Project has filed suit challenging Nevada's grossly inadequate medical care at Ely Prison, which houses the state's death row.
|
|
© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004 |
One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites.
We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published.
Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section.