www.aclu.orgJOIN THE ACLUTAKE ACTIONDONATEABOUT US
ACLU Blog of Rights - Official Blog of the ACLU National Office Blog of Rights Homepage Support the ACLU

Join Us At:

Sep 17th, 2009 Google Bookmarks Technorati StumbleUpon Digg! Reddit Delicious Facebook
Posted by Christopher Hill, Capital Punishment Project at 2:56pm

No Suitable Vein

On Monday, Ohio's execution team was unable to find a suitable vein in Romell Broom's arm so it could not inject poison into his body and put an end to his life. The failed attempts took so long that Ohio Gov. Ted Strickland finally gave Broom a reprieve until next week. Ohio has not done well with lethal injections.

Although the United States Supreme Court ruled in Baze v. Rees that Kentucky's three-drug cocktail did not create a substantial risk of causing unnecessary pain, the fact of the matter is that the lethal injection process is fraught with problems.

One big problem is finding a suitable vein. The Broom case demonstrates this, as do a number of others. After Angel Diaz was executed in Florida in December of 2006, an autopsy showed that the chemicals burned through his soft tissue indicating that the needles went through his vein rather than in his vein. Then-Gov. Jeb Bush instituted a moratorium to find out why the Diaz execution went so wrong.

Six years earlier, Florida had problems executing Bennie Demps by lethal injection because the execution team had difficulties finding a suitable vein. Demps claimed that he was "butchered" and he was bleeding "profusely" before the lethal drugs were administered. According to the warden, a "surgical procedure" had to be performed to find a suitable vein.

Botched executions in the quest to find a suitable vein transcends location, gender and infamy. Ricky Ray Rector made national news in 1992 when Arkansas governor and then-presidential candidate Bill Clinton left the campaign trail to ensure Rector's execution took place. The execution took 55 minutes because a suitable vein could not be found. In 2000, Arkansas had a problem finding a vein to insert into the arm of Christina Riggs. The team finally put the lethal needles in her wrists.

In Georgia, the execution team could not find veins for Jose High in 2001, John Hightower in 2007, or Curtis Osborne in 2008. Texas's problems include at least two inmates assisting the team with finding usable veins. In 1998, Texas executed Joseph Cannon. His vein collapsed and the needle came out during his execution causing Cannon to shout "it's come undone."

Execution teams come up with many excuses about the trouble they have. They say that suitable veins are hard to find in a person with a history of intravenous drug use. They also say that it is difficult to place needles in the arms of overweight inmates. Whatever the excuses, the inability to find a suitable vein creates an excruciating experience for the condemned, and sometimes the witnesses.

The fact of the matter is that there are no suitable veins. There is no humane way to end a person's life. When ruling Nebraska's electric chair was cruel and unusual punishment, Judge Connolly said "[w]e recognize the temptation to make the prisoner suffer, just as the prisoner made an innocent victim suffer. But it is the hallmark of a civilized society that we punish cruelty without practicing it." The only way we can punish cruelty without practicing it is to abolish capital punishment.

Google Bookmarks Technorati StumbleUpon Digg! Reddit Delicious Facebook
We intend the comments portion of this blog to be a forum where you can freely express your views on blog postings and on comments made by other people. Given that, please understand that you are responsible for the material you post on the comments portion of this blog. The only postings that we ask that you refrain from posting and that we cannot permit on our website are requests for legal assistance and postings that could cause ACLU to incur legal liability.

One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites.

We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published.

Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section.

6 Responses to "No Suitable Vein"

  1. you are all douche bags Says:

    you are all douche bags

  2. Maggie Says:

    Maybe they got a chance to see how their victim felt.

  3. Alvin McCuistion Says:

    Can't find a vein! What hacks. The families of these victims should sue the 'execution team' members and state Governors personally for medical malpractice and ask for summary judgments based on res ipsa loquitor.

  4. Steve Says:

    I notice you don't talk about the crimes your criminals commited. Why?

  5. Joy Says:

    While I do support the efforts of the ACLU from a constitutional perspective, I also very much approve of the death penalty. Criminals who are guilty of murder beyond ANY doubt forfeit their rights as human beings. Thus, I really don't care how much they suffer. In fact, I don't think they suffer enough.

  6. roald Says:

    Maggie and Joy - "Vengeance is mine, sayeth the Lord", not the State. Torturing a condemned person teaches the person nothing and has been shown not to deter others.

    Steve and Joy - The criminals are in prison, "paying" for their crimes. Torturing them and even killing them does not bring back their victims.

    Consider also the irrevocable nature of the death penalty against the significant number of condemned, executed people who have been proven innocent.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image. Ignore spaces and be careful about upper and lower case.
 

Quicksearch


© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004
This is the Web site of the American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU Foundation.
Learn more about the distinction between these two components of the ACLU.

User Agreement | Privacy Statement | FAQs | Site Map

Statistics image