Aug 31st, 2009
Posted by Suzanne Ito, ACLU at 3:17pm	Capital Punishment, Criminal Justice, Defending Targets of Discrimination

Shouting From the Rooftops

As Chris wrote last week, an investigation into the 1991 fire that killed the three children of Cameron Willingham found that it was not intentionally set, and that Willingham, who was charged with arson and subsequently executed in 2004 for the crime, may very well have been innocent. Two notable pieces followed last week's news.

An op-ed in today's New York Times states:

The Willingham investigation, which is continuing, is further evidence that the criminal justice system is far too flawed to justify imposing a death penalty.

…The commission is to be commended for conducting this inquiry, but it is outrageous that Texas is conducting its careful, highly skilled investigation after Mr. Willingham has been executed, rather than before.

And a lengthier piece in the New Yorker that provides a recounting of the fire, the trial and subsequent legal appeals on behalf of Willingham, concludes:

Some legal scholars believe that the commission may narrowly assess the reliability of the scientific evidence. There is a chance, however, that Texas could become the first state to acknowledge officially that, since the advent of the modern judicial system, it had carried out the “execution of a legally and factually innocent person.”

It bears repeating that 135 people have been exonerated from this country's death rows since 1973. One of those exonerees is Ernest Willis, who served 17 years after being convicted and sentenced to death for a crime nearly identical to Willingham's. Given the overwhelming evidence from four separate forensic examinations of the fire — conducted by the Chicago Tribune, the Innocence Project (PDF), Dr. Gerald Hurst and Craig Beyler (PDF) — Texas has executed an innocent man. That state's investigation of the evidence in Willingham's case is too little, too late.

The New Yorker article includes a quote from Justice Antonin Scalia's concurring opinion in Kansas v. Marsh in 2006:

In his opinion, Scalia declared that, in the modern judicial system, there has not been “a single case—not one—in which it is clear that a person was executed for a crime he did not commit. If such an event had occurred in recent years, we would not have to hunt for it; the innocent’s name would be shouted from the rooftops.”

It's time to start shouting.

h/t: Steve Hall, StandDown

Permalink |	Capital Punishment, Criminal Justice, Defending Targets of Discrimination

1. Martin Shellabarger Says:
   Sep 7th, 2009 at 4:40pm

   Wake up Nemo!
   The whole sickly slimy system is built on corruption, not the high ideals of the founding fathers. . . all empires go through the same process: birth, rise, and. . . fall. Amerika is just coasting past it zenith and entering the long negative slope of its decline.

2. fada Says:
   Sep 14th, 2009 at 9:38pm

   Frozen winter is coming,do you like to buy ugg to preventing cold and keeping warm.As a pursuer for the most stylish ,is there any ugg boots you have in mind?I think you have no excuse anymore if you don't have a pair of UGG Bailey Button Boots.The Bailey Button UGG can be worn as a UGG classic short Boots or UGG classic mini Boots . Hottest pop style.If you like the UGG tall boots,www.realugg.com can provide high quality of Ugg Tall Boots in low price,Are you straitened for Ugg Boots Insoles,don't worry ,we have the best Ugg Boots Insoles on sale ,many of which are hand made by craftspeople.RealUGG,Inc came up with some new-styles- Ugg Lo Pro Button , Ugg Women's Rainier, We offer a wide range of UGG Boots in different color and styles. Browse the website, we are sure you will find Real UGG to tempt you!

3. sooran Says:
   Sep 17th, 2009 at 5:30am

   tancks
   this post very very helped me !

   Good Time

4. Rusty Nelson Says:
   Oct 3rd, 2009 at 12:06am

   Justice Scalia has long ignored people shouting from the rooftops. Before his sickening appointment to the Supreme Court, there was the case of Leonel Herrera...in Texas, of course. Herrera appealed to the Supreme's shortly before his scheduled execution because his brother had died, and his nephew revealed that it was his father who had committed the crime for which Leonel was condemned. The court said, in effect, Herrera was obviously innocent, but he had a fair trial, so it's not up to us, but the governor, to stop the execution. Gov. Richards was in a re-election panic with George W. Bush, and there was no way she was going to stop an execution in Texas. Herrera was killed, and the state was allowed to forget all about it. Some of us, of course, have continued to shout about it after all these outrageous and self-righteous claims from serial executioners like Scalia, Bush, and Perry. There will be no apology from Texas for Willingham's death, but we will make progress, and we will make a fuss in Texas and in my killing state of Washington.