The Trial of Jeff Wood(Originally posted on Daily Kos.) In Franz Kafka’s novel, The Trial, the main character is prosecuted and executed for an unnamed crime. We like to think that this kind of absurd surrealism only happens in literature. But something similarly absurd is occurring in the U.S. death penalty system. Texas planned to execute Jeffery Wood tonight for murder even though he did not kill anyone nor did he intend that anyone be killed. He was not even in the building when the person he was convicted of killing was murdered. The fact that a judge has stayed his execution for last-minute assessment of his mental competency doesn't detract from the absurdity that he's still on death row. Wood and Daniel Reneau drove to a convenience store which they had planned to rob. Reneau got out of the car by himself, walked into the store, and shot and killed Keeran. Reneau was executed for robbery and murder in 2002. Wood was convicted under Texas’s Law of Parties. Under the Law of Parties, people can be executed even if they didn't kill anyone. This exists in other states as the felony murder rule. Another surreal aspect to Wood’s case: In 2007, the Board of Pardons and Parole recommended to Texas Governor Rick Perry that he stay the execution of Kenneth Foster. Like Wood, Foster was also tried under the Law of Parties because he was the driver when a murder was committed. Also like Wood, Foster neither killed nor intended to kill. Governor Perry commuted Foster’s sentence stating that it was unfair that he was tried with the person who actually committed the murder. In Wood’s case, however, the Board of Pardons and Parole inexplicably and unanimously voted against commutation. Thankfully, a court stepped to stop the execution and order a mental evaluation. This does not mean the process in not any less absurd. In fact, it proves the point. A jury once found Wood incompetent to stand trial in the first place. He was later found competent but he refused to allow his lawyers to put on a defense. He was hours from an execution just to get back to where he was when the court process began. The Kafkaesque is not limited to Texas. A similarly bizarre execution just occurred in Mississippi. Dale Bishop was executed for a murder. Unlike Wood, he participated in the murder, but he was not the actual killer. What is surreal is that the actual killer is serving life in prison. These cases provide further evidence that not only is the death penalty fraught with error and basic unfairness, but it is the height of absurdity.
We intend the comments portion of this blog to be a forum where you can freely express your views on blog postings and on comments made by other people. Given that, please understand that you are responsible for the material you post on the comments portion of this blog. The only postings that we ask that you refrain from posting and that we cannot permit on our website are requests for legal assistance and postings that could cause ACLU to incur legal liability.
One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites. We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published. Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section. 1 Response to "The Trial of Jeff Wood" |
|
© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004 |
Aug 22nd, 2008 at 12:37pm
These criminal cases are refered to as Kafkaesque, yet in each case the defendant's specific crime has been stated during trial prior to sentencing. If, in Kafka's The Trial, the defendant's crime is never specified, there is no analogy to the murder accomplices mentioned in the article who have all been tried and convicted according to specific sentencing guidelines. Leave it to the American Criminal Liberties Union to miss this gnawing inconsistency.