American NGOs Brief CERD Panel
This afternoon, American NGOs had the first opportunity to present to members of the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD). Representatives covered a broad array of issues arising from a range of geographical areas. Although the concerns addressed varied widely, all of them presented a stark contrast to the United States' claims of a network of legal protections administered by law enforcement at all levels of government all operating to the benefit of all American people.
Some advocates testified about the ways that those responsible for enforcing laws all too often are sources of fear. Individuals testified about the ways that police and border control agents beat and sexually abuse of women of color and immigrants; about the ways that police officers assigned to schools in New York City and elsewhere in the United States harass and abuse the students they are supposed to protect; how women of color, particularly tribal women, who report physical abuse have their complaints ignored or, worse, are subjected to physical abuse by law enforcement agents; how foster children, mostly children of color, are denied the opportunity to see and build relationships with incarcerated mothers and how incarcerated women face the indignity of giving birth while shackled to their beds. In some cases, such as the treatment of African-Americans in post-Katrina New Orleans, strategic neglect has been added to mistreatment. Advocates recounted the persistence of police checkpoints in African-American neighborhoods, continued police violence toward people of color, and the disproportionate efforts to rebuild wealthy white neighborhoods while poorer communities of color are permitted to languish with their problems unaddressed and no plans in place to revitalize those communities or create viable housing for their residents. The testimony, though lasting only an hour, suggested widespread patterns of systemic discrimination on the basis of race, gender, immigration status, ethnicity, and gender identity too extensive to describe here. Although the testimony precluded time for questioning by the panel, its members promised to return to the subject of the testimony at convening later this week. All of the advocates, who represent a dizzying array of NGOs, are hopeful that the testimony is a meaningful step in the effort to convey the persistence of racial injustice in the United States.
Tags: Civil Liberties News |
|
© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004 |
One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites.
We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published.
Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section.