Congress to Examine Juvenile Life Without Parole — A Human Rights Stain for the U.S.The 110th Congress, for all its faults, has really marked an important shift at the federal-level on juvenile justice reform. Congress has refused to move a punitive-heavy, “get tough” gangs bill. In fact, there was a hearing back in June on positive, intervention and prevention-based strategies to confront youth violence and gangs. Imagine that, actually highlighting practices that have been shown to work. I must be working in the wrong city! Anyway, just before the August recess, the Senate Judiciary Committee approved reauthorization of the landmark Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act. Later this afternoon, there is going to be a hearing in the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime regarding legislation that would end the practice of sentencing children to life without the possibility of parole — the Juvenile Justice Accountability and Improvement Act. This is an issue that the ACLU has been working on for years, and we are very happy to see it finally getting the attention it deserves and is long overdue. Estimates have placed the number of individuals serving life without parole sentences for crimes committed before the age of 18 approaching 2,500 — a disproportionate number being children of color. Sadly, this is a uniquely American practice. Until February of this year, Human Rights Watch found juveniles serving life without parole sentences in only one other country — Israel (which had a total of seven individuals serving such sentences). However, Israeli officials have confirmed that the seven individuals serving these life without parole sentences are now entitled to parole review, leaving the U.S., with its nearly 2,500 cases, all alone in the world. Since 2006, three different international human rights treaty bodies have expressed grave concerns over the practice of sentencing children to life without parole. In 2006, the national ACLU and the ACLU of Michigan filed a petition with the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights on behalf of 32 juveniles who were tried and convicted as adults and given mandatory life sentences for crimes committed when they were under the age of 18 without any consideration to their status as children. This petition is still pending before the Commission to this day. Hopefully today’s hearing won’t be the end-all-be-all, but rather the first serious step by Congress in what will eventually spell the end of one of the most pressing human rights challenges confronting our criminal justice system. Here’s hoping…
We intend the comments portion of this blog to be a forum where you can freely express your views on blog postings and on comments made by other people. Given that, please understand that you are responsible for the material you post on the comments portion of this blog. The only postings that we ask that you refrain from posting and that we cannot permit on our website are requests for legal assistance and postings that could cause ACLU to incur legal liability.
One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites. We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published. Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section. 1 Response to "Congress to Examine Juvenile Life Without Parole — A Human Rights Stain for the U.S. " |
|
© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004 |
Sep 14th, 2008 at 6:40pm
By removing the sentence of life without parole for minors, are you not making it harder for victims of crime and there families from getting justice.
And what about the cold blooded killers who should stay locked up for life. Do you want to see them back on the streets so they can kill again just because they have to be a minor.
If a person commits a crime, the person should do the time based on the crime itself. If the crime merits life without parole, the criminal should get life without parole, regardless of age.
Age is only a mitgating factor, it should not be a license to commit crimes with impunity or automatically mean the criminal should get a lighter sentence.