CategoriesJoin Us At:
|
The Golden Child of the Legislative Process Our word today is Unanimous Consent. You can basically think of it like this — if parliamentary tactics somehow formed a family (cute, huh?) and the filibuster (which we'll explain tomorrow) was the black sheep (aww…poor little fella), unanimous consent would be the favorite child (you know the type). Unanimous consent is a device used to expedite the legislative process through the mutual agreement of all representatives or senators. Proceedings in the House of Representatives or the Senate and action on legislation (including passage) often take place upon the “unanimous consent” of the members of the respective chamber. Believe it or not, Congress considers a lot of bills during a congressional session (granted, a fair amount aren’t worth their weight in salt) and if it had to spend untold hours every day on debating and voting on the naming of naming post offices, well, nothing would ever get done. Unanimous consent allows for a fast-tracking of the tedious and time-consuming aspects of the legislative process. The key to unanimous consent is that it can only be used when all members agree. If even one member objects, that’s it. Deal off! Capiche? Just like any other parliamentary device, unanimous consent can be used for both good and…well how about an example? Late last year, the Senate passed S. 456, the Gang Abatement and Prevention Act by unanimous consent. The ACLU had a lot of problems with this punitive-heavy legislation, not the least of which was the fact that it contained provisions to further provide for juveniles to receive sentences of life without the possibility of parole. Fortunately, it has not advanced in the House of Representatives. While unanimous consent certainly is convenient in that it allows the process to proceed in a much timelier, expedited manner, you have to keep your eyes peeled for the occasional unwelcome surprise.
Tags: Civil Liberties News, Congress-ese, lawmaking
We intend the comments portion of this blog to be a forum where you can freely express your views on blog postings and on comments made by other people. Given that, please understand that you are responsible for the material you post on the comments portion of this blog. The only postings that we ask that you refrain from posting and that we cannot permit on our website are requests for legal assistance and postings that could cause ACLU to incur legal liability.
One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites. We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published. Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section. 3 Responses to "The Golden Child of the Legislative Process " |
|
© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004 |
Sep 4th, 2008 at 7:53pm
If only people knew some of the more seriously important laws that got passed in the same manner as the naming of Post Offices.
The Adam Walsh Act to name one...
Sep 5th, 2008 at 8:18pm
The key term which needs to be brought up in the context of "unanimous consent" is "quorum"; "Unanimous consent" is a way of circumventing the quorum requirement, a clause of the Constitution the ACLU ought to be as concerned about as any other.
It's easy to get unanimity when there are only three or four members present, and they agree not to have a roll called to expose that fact.
Sep 7th, 2008 at 10:25pm
Capiche? If you meant the Italian word for "Do you understand?", then it should be spelled "capice."