www.aclu.orgJOIN THE ACLUTAKE ACTIONABOUT US
ACLU Blog of Rights - Official Blog of the ACLU National Office American Civil Liberties Union Homepage Blog of Rights Homepage Support the ACLU
Jul 9th, 2008
Posted by Jackie Saffir, Washington Legislative Office at 4:50pm

Mukasey Muddle

Wow. Senators on the Judiciary Committee posed questions on a lot of issues to Attorney General Michael Mukasey, but there is very little to be happy about.

Senator Joe Biden (D-Del.) chose to start his questioning by talking about the politicization of the Department of Justice. He starts with the obvious. He asks Mukasey, when you arrived at the DOJ, was it politicized? Mukasey says when he arrived, he saw a lot of dedicated people, but no, it was not politicized. Biden then asks if Mukasey thinks the criticism of the Inspector General report (discussing the politicization of the DOJ) was justified. Mukasey says yes. Now, I was a little confused but was glad it was not just me. Biden tells Mukasey, “You really are an enigma to me… I find it difficult to understand you.” Join the club.

Next issue. Senator Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) wants to know what Mukasey is doing to fight obscenity. Mukasey reassures him that he is targeting cases of “behavior that we think is disgraceful” that will have the “greatest effect.” He adds that they prosecute cases that are sure winners so they don’t stir people up about things like free speech and expression on more borderline cases. What a relief.

My man Russ Feingold (D-Wisc.) is curious about the new FBI profiling strategies (discussed in this AP article) that may allow them to conduct investigations on individuals with no substantial evidence. Feingold asks if ethnicity or national origin would be enough to investigate someone, to which Mukasey says no. But then Feingold asks, hypothetically, if an American citizen of Pakistani origin, who maybe visits Pakistan occasionally, could be targeted for that alone. No matter how long Feingold tries to get an answer, Mukasey insists that he couldn’t possibly answer a hypothetical question and that the guidelines are not finalized yet, but does not rule it out.

Senator Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) is pissed. He asks Mukasey about the investigation into whether the prosecution of former Alabama Governor Donald Siegelman was done for political reasons. Mukasey assures us that the investigation is being conducted quickly and thoroughly, but when Schumer asks him if he promises to make the results public, Mukasey declines. Schumer asks a good question when he inquires, what possible reason would prevent Mukasey from releasing these results to the public? Mukasey doesn’t have an answer and Schumer, visibly annoyed, says “I find these answers very disappointing,” and turns off his mic.

A lot of other issues were brought up including FBI shortages and support for state and local law enforcement, but overall I think the senators tried to deduce whether we could restore our confidence in the attorney general. In his opening statement, Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) reminded us that the attorney general is not counsel for any individual, party, or administration. He says:

the Department of Justice is not the President’s legal defense team any more than the Attorney General is his lawyer. The Attorney General is not the White House counsel and should not act as one.
But I don’t think Mukasey gave us much reason to think he is of a different flavor. And even if he is conducting business differently now, we should be concerned about his unwillingness to look back. Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) put it well when he reminded Mukasey that “this is not just about your integrity.” Though he may be an improvement, we still have a stake in what our government was. And as Justice Brandeis once said, “sunlight is the best disinfectant.”

Tags: Civil Liberties News

We intend the comments portion of this blog to be a forum where you can freely express your views on blog postings and on comments made by other people. Given that, please understand that you are responsible for the material you post on the comments portion of this blog. The only postings that we ask that you refrain from posting and that we cannot permit on our website are requests for legal assistance and postings that could cause ACLU to incur legal liability.

One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites.

We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published.

Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section.

2 Responses to "Mukasey Muddle"

  1. FreedomFriend Says:

    Chuckie Shumer is very disappointed? Well, maybe he shouldn't have recommended Hiz Honor in the first place!

  2. Alvin McCuistion Says:

    Senator Schumer approved of Judge Mukasey understanding if he didn't the next nominee sent up by the President would be worse. Senator Feinstein approved him understanding if she did not, the President would not send up another nominee. My feeling is that selection of an Attorney General should be considered important and very qualified nominees should be proposed.

Comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
 

© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004
This is the Web site of the American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU Foundation.
Learn more about the distinction between these two components of the ACLU.

User Agreement | Privacy Statement | FAQs | Site Map

Statistics image