www.aclu.orgJOIN THE ACLUTAKE ACTIONABOUT US
ACLU Blog of Rights - Official Blog of the ACLU National Office American Civil Liberties Union Homepage Blog of Rights Homepage Support the ACLU
Oct 19th, 2007
Posted by Suzanne Ito, ACLU at 1:35pm

Mukasey's Postion on Torture is Unclear After Two Days of Hearings

The confirmation hearings for Attorney General nominee Michael Mukasey were a jumble of opinions.

On the abuse of executive power, Mukasey said Wednesday: "I would certainly suggest going to Congress whenever we can. It always strengthens the hand of the president...Unilateralism, across the board, is a bad idea." Sounds good.

(Chuck Schumer questioned Mukasey on executive power like a chatty book club member. The book, in this case, is Jack Goldsmith's Terror Presidency. Mukasey "couldn't put it down," BTW. And Schumer's copy was all Post-It noted.)

When asked his thoughts on Guantanamo, Mukasey hesitated a bit, but ultimately concluded: "I'm prepared to say we need to get the best advice and the best ideas we can, with the goal of closing it down." He joins the ACLU, and most Americans, (and the Secretary of Defense, and the Secretary of State, and Kofi Annan...) on that one.

When talk turned to torture, on Wednesday he said: "It's antithetical to everything this country stands for," and compared it to the Holocaust. That was in pretty stark contrast to former AG Gonzales calling the Geneva Conventions on torture "quaint" and "obsolete." Mukasey also claimed to not know what waterboarding entailed.

But on Day Two of the hearing, Mukasey called torture unconstitutional, but after hearing Senator Whitehouse's description of waterboarding, refused to call it torture. He even implied that torture would be okay if the president signed off.

(For a good example of double-speak on torture, check out ACLU attorney Ben Wizner's interview of Rendition director Gavin Hood, where Ben discusses former CIA director George Tenet's famous "we don't torture" interview on 60 Minutes.)

When it comes to an AG nominee, we're looking for someone who doesn't hedge. We're looking for someone who will promise the American public that he'll follow the rules; in this case, the rules outlined in the Army Field Manual on Intelligence Interrogations. (Check out the 177-page .pdf, if inclined.)

We'd also like a nominee who will commit to providing key documents supporting an illegal interrogation program. A little sunshine inside the DOJ sounds nice, doesn't it?

Senator Leahy says he won't hold a vote on Mukasey's confirmation until he receives written responses to some questions raised after the two-day hearing. Let's hope those answers include some reassurances that Mukasey will bring about changes that will restore dignity to a disgraced Justice Department.

Tags: Civil Liberties News

We intend the comments portion of this blog to be a forum where you can freely express your views on blog postings and on comments made by other people. Given that, please understand that you are responsible for the material you post on the comments portion of this blog. The only postings that we ask that you refrain from posting and that we cannot permit on our website are requests for legal assistance and postings that could cause ACLU to incur legal liability.

One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites.

We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published.

Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section.

Comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
 

© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004
This is the Web site of the American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU Foundation.
Learn more about the distinction between these two components of the ACLU.

User Agreement | Privacy Statement | FAQs | Site Map

Statistics image