www.aclu.orgJOIN THE ACLUTAKE ACTIONABOUT US
ACLU Blog of Rights - Official Blog of the ACLU National Office American Civil Liberties Union Homepage Blog of Rights Homepage Support the ACLU
Jul 31st, 2009
Posted by Emily Zia, Washington Legislative Office at 10:36am

Another Huge Step Towards Cracking the Disparity

Last week, we commended the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security for doing a markup of the long-awaited Fairness in Cocaine Sentencing Act of 2009 (H.R. 3245), sponsored by Rep. Robert Scott (D-Va.). This week, we have even more to cheer about: yesterday, the full House Judiciary Committee voted in favor of the bill by a vote of 16-9. This landmark and historic committee vote clears the way for the bill, which will now head to the full House of Representatives for a final vote.

The Fairness in Cocaine Sentencing Act of 2009 seeks to eliminate the notorious disparity between sentences for crack cocaine and powder cocaine, two different forms of the same drug. Possession of five grams of crack cocaine (roughly the size of a sugar packet, or two pennies) can lead to a mandatory minimum sentence of five years in prison. It takes possession of 500 grams of powder cocaine to yield the same minimum sentence — that's 100 times more powder cocaine than crack cocaine for the same sentence. A terrible side effect of this disparity is that over 80 percent of the people prosecuted for crack possession are African-American, despite the fact that the majority of crack users are either white or Hispanic. Most of those prosecuted for crack receive excessive sentences (as much as 24 ½ years) for nonviolent first offenses. It's simply not right.

Over the past couple of weeks, media coverage and public outrage over the 100-to-1 crack cocaine disparity has been growing rapidly, from both Democrats and Republicans alike. In a humorous moment, Senator Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) mentioned "doing that crack cocaine thing" with Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) at the Supreme Court confirmation hearings for Sonia Sotomayor. Attorney General Eric Holder said in a speech last week, "We all know that this egregious difference in punishment is simply wrong." And last Sunday, the Washington Post published a superb editorial that urged lawmakers to end the disparity and vote in favor of the bill.

It is clear that most people agree with us: after 23 years of this appalling disparity, it's time to change the law and abolish the differences in crack and powder cocaine sentencing. The House Judiciary Committee's vote has taken us one step closer to achieving this goal. Next, the bill will head to the House of Representatives for a full vote; we strongly urge the House to pass this bill. Join us and take action to urge Congress to pass the Fairness in Cocaine Sentencing Act of 2009. It is time to put an end to this unfortunate chapter in criminal justice history. We can see the light at the end of the tunnel — now, all Congress has to do is get us there.

We intend the comments portion of this blog to be a forum where you can freely express your views on blog postings and on comments made by other people. Given that, please understand that you are responsible for the material you post on the comments portion of this blog. The only postings that we ask that you refrain from posting and that we cannot permit on our website are requests for legal assistance and postings that could cause ACLU to incur legal liability.

One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites.

We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published.

Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section.

5 Responses to "Another Huge Step Towards Cracking the Disparity "

  1. Jack Wilson Says:

    My copy of the constitution does say 'all drugs are created equal' so this really makes sense as a major ACLU issue.

  2. roald Says:

    Jack, my copy of our Constitution says that people are to be treated equally. That make the different punishments an ACLU issue.

  3. Jason K Says:

    "A terrible side effect of this disparity is that over 80 percent of the people prosecuted for crack possession are African-American, despite the fact that the majority of crack users are either white or Hispanic."

    I've always heard this, but never seen any figures cited...

  4. roald Says:

    I would like some cites supporting the relative use of the different forms among segments of our society and their arrest rates. The reports I read, though representing only a sample of people arrested in six, high heroin use cities -
    http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles/167265.pdf -
    does not reflect this unless I am misreading it.

  5. TIER Says:

    WHEN I THINK OF THIS IT MAKES ME GRIEVE FOR MY SON WHO HAS DONE THREE YAERS ON A TEN YEAR SENTENCE IN THE STATE OF IOWA PENITENTARY BARELY AT THE AGE OF EIGHTEEN YEARS OLD FOR 5 GRAMS COCAINE /AND 5 GRAMS POWDER= HIM 10 YEARS IN MAXIMUM SECURITY PRISON.
    NOW, HE IS 20 YEARS OLD AND HAS NOT MADE IT HOME YET.....
    THIS REASON OF HIM BEING INCARCERATED
    IS LIKE, NO LONGER THE ISSUE...
    THE ISSUE NOW IS MEANS FOR SURVIVAL TO HIM FROM PREDITORS AND OTHER VIOLENT OFFENDERS.
    PLEASE HELP MY SON #6399395 ISRRAEL SANTIAGO : I.S.P. FORT MADISON ,IOWA
    SENTENCED AS ADULT ,BARLEY AT THE AGE OF 18 YEARS OLD FOR A NON-VIOLENT CRIME GIVEN MORE TIME THAN SOME WHO HAVE COMMITTED MURDER.
    From a greiving mother,
    clotier dixon

Comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
 

© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004
This is the Web site of the American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU Foundation.
Learn more about the distinction between these two components of the ACLU.

User Agreement | Privacy Statement | FAQs | Site Map

Statistics image