2009 Supreme Court Term PreviewThis morning in Washington, D.C., we are hosting our annual Supreme Court breakfast, in which attorneys discuss cases that the ACLU will or may be arguing in the upcoming term. This year's breakfast will have three speakers: ACLU Legal Director Steve Shapiro; Jameel Jaffer, Director of the ACLU National Security Project; and Peter Eliasberg, Managing Attorney at the ACLU of Southern California. Steve kicks off the breakfast with an overview of the upcoming term and the civil liberties issues at stake. Jameel discusses Department of Defense v. ACLU, our Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit over photographs depicting the abuse of prisoners at detention facilities in Afghanistan and Iraq. The question before the court is whether the government can rely on an exemption to the Freedom of Information Act to withhold the photographs on the basis of a general assertion that their release could provoke a violent response. The government has asked the Supreme Court to review an appellate court decision that found in our favor, requiring the Defense Department to release these photographs. We should hear whether the Supreme Court will hear the case by September 29. Finally, Peter discusses Salazar v. Buono, a case that will address whether the government has adequately remedied the Establishment Clause violation created by the presence of a Latin cross in the Mojave Desert National Preserve by transferring one acre of land surrounding the cross to the Veterans of Foreign Wars while also designating the cross as a national memorial. The lower courts agreed with the ACLU that the government's actions compounded the Establishment Clause problem rather than resolving it. Peter will argue the case before the court on October 7. Learn more about this case by reading Peter's statement.
Tags: U.S. Supreme Court
We intend the comments portion of this blog to be a forum where you can freely express your views on blog postings and on comments made by other people. Given that, please understand that you are responsible for the material you post on the comments portion of this blog. The only postings that we ask that you refrain from posting and that we cannot permit on our website are requests for legal assistance and postings that could cause ACLU to incur legal liability.
One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites. We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published. Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section. 4 Responses to "2009 Supreme Court Term Preview" |
|
© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004 |
Sep 23rd, 2009 at 10:41am
Since John Roberts lied like a rug during his confirmation hearing when he claimed that he wasn't a pro-corporate right-wing ideologue, Austin vs. The Michigan Chamber of Commerce will probably be overturned. This will overwhelm the political system with corporate cash, which will effectively silence independent, less well-funded voices. Too, the prospect for campaign finance reform will end for good, as using corporate profits to influence elections will be inextricably, and inexplicably, linked to 'free speech.'
One should never underestimate unfettered corporate power coupled with an industry-friendly government. We should eliminate corporate personhood for good, and not confuse free speech for sentient beings with corporate spending intended to sway voters to their own benefit.
Sep 27th, 2009 at 1:15pm
I support most everything the ACLU does, that's why I'm a member, but I can't support the ACLU's position on Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. The ACLU's brief argues against McCain-Feingold on First Amendment grounds, which implicitly accepts the position that corporations are people and entitled to all Constitutional rights given to actual living persons.
This is not a First Amendment issue, but is instead an issue on corporate personhood, and I think the ACLU should make an argument against corporate personhood or, at the least, withdraw their brief against McCain-Feingold.
Oct 1st, 2009 at 5:06pm
And, I personally believe that, after you are done trashing another cross in our country.......that we Christians are going to take the huge ball and chain to the Islam radical school about to be erected and open for business this fall. You people are sooooooo busy trying to be "politically correct" you have lost your sense of morals and common sense. Since the percentages of Christians vs NON-Christians is way out of line anyway, we Christians are about to take this country back. And the illegals.....haven't we paid enough for them yet? Now we got the towelheads telling us which prayer day we can honor? Last laugh is on you jerks anyhow. You like books? Read the end of the Bible........YOU LOSE!
Nov 18th, 2009 at 10:16am
Wow Jay, what a loving Christian example you must be. Reminder: Christ was the ultimate pacifist activist. Ghandi and Martin Luther King Jr couldn't hold a candle to the epitome of tolerance and brotherly love. Towel heads? Take this country back?! Figure out who the real enemies are then get back to us... Cryder and Simpkin have it right. Corporate Personhood is the most pressing issue of our time. Kill that and watch the world change before our eyes.