CategoriesJoin Us At:
|
"The Fat Lady Has Sung for the Fourth Amendment"Sacramento's KXTV reported on our lawsuit to enforce our Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for records about Customs and Border Protection’s (CBP) policy of searching travelers’ laptops without suspicion of wrongdoing. We want to see the criteria used for selecting passengers for suspicionless searches, the number of people who have been subject to the searches, the number of devices and documents retained and the reasons for their retention. Pretty basic stuff, we think. "I don't carry my laptop overseas anymore," said Sacramento attorney Mark Reichel. "The fat lady has sung for the fourth amendment."You could also encrypt your hard drive, as the ACLU’s Technology and Liberty Project public education director, Jay Stanley, suggested last month. But whether you're using software or express mail to get around the CBP's invasive policy, those solutions don't address the fact that the government is violating your Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable searches and seizures. KXTV’s news segment features ACLU National Security Project attorney Larry Schwartztol explaining why laptop searches at the border are different from traditional searches of luggage. As Larry explains, your luggage probably doesn’t contain personal documents and files, pictures of your family and friends, all of your email correspondence or sensitive business information. Has your laptop been searched at the border? We want to hear your story. Contact us at "nspintake [at] aclu.org."
We intend the comments portion of this blog to be a forum where you can freely express your views on blog postings and on comments made by other people. Given that, please understand that you are responsible for the material you post on the comments portion of this blog. The only postings that we ask that you refrain from posting and that we cannot permit on our website are requests for legal assistance and postings that could cause ACLU to incur legal liability.
One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites. We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published. Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section. 8 Responses to ""The Fat Lady Has Sung for the Fourth Amendment"" |
|
© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004 |
Sep 9th, 2009 at 4:54pm
my computer has never been searched at the border, but what about that sneaky little attachment the government put in the contract for the cash for clunkers? where they are able to access your e-mail, any personal information you have on your computer, etc.? why wasn't that being shouted all over the news, to warn people?
Sep 10th, 2009 at 6:16pm
Could you post a story or any information that addresses parental rights regarding removing children from federal educational programs deemed inappropriate by the parent for the student.
Sep 10th, 2009 at 7:42pm
Quite simple Debra, when the ACLU is in agreement with the administration that is in power, civil liberties tend to go out the window. Now if the Bush or Reagan administrations were pulling this crap, the "great defenders" of the Bill of right would surely be up in arms.
Sep 10th, 2009 at 9:57pm
Ms. Johnson, let me direct you to an analysis of the cash for clunkers rules. Bottom line, your concerns are unfounded.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2009/aug/03/glenn-b eck-cash-clunkers-web-site/
Sep 11th, 2009 at 11:16am
There are enough real privacy concerns to worry about Debra. Stop spreading that urban legend. http://www.snopes.com/computer/internet/clunkers.asp
Sep 11th, 2009 at 2:01pm
I'm pretty sure that applied to whatever information was uploaded to the cars.gov website, so it could be scanned for viruses and such.
Sep 12th, 2009 at 10:24pm
We need to get serious about privacy. Enough is enough.
Sep 15th, 2009 at 12:17pm
When the fourth amendment is ignored never forget the second!
LIVE FREE OR DIE.