www.aclu.orgJOIN THE ACLUTAKE ACTIONABOUT US
ACLU Blog of Rights - Official Blog of the ACLU National Office American Civil Liberties Union Homepage Blog of Rights Homepage Support the ACLU
Apr 21st, 2010
Posted by Catherine Crump, First Amendment Working Group at 5:29pm

North Carolina Wants to Know What You Bought from Amazon

On Monday, Amazon.com sued the State of North Carolina after the state issued a summons that would, according to Amazon, require it to identify what books, CDs and DVDs its customers in North Carolina had purchased. The North Carolina Department of Revenue had requested this information to ensure that Amazon is in full compliance with the state's sales and use tax laws.

We were alarmed at this news, because what people choose to read is deeply personal, and reader privacy is strongly protected by the First Amendment.

After the ACLU of North Carolina sent the state Department of Revenue a letter warning that it would be unconstitutional for the state to gain overbroad access to customer records, the state responded to Amazon's lawsuit, denying that it wanted to know the specific titles and subject matters of books. We are relieved that the state appears to recognize the inappropriate, intrusive and constitutionally suspect nature of such a demand.

While the facts of this particular case remain murky, it is crystal clear that the government is interested in what you're reading. This is not the first time Amazon.com has received and fought such requests. In 2006, Amazon received a subpoena (PDF) for the book purchase records of 24,000 people — a subpoena a court described as seriously troubling because, if it became widely known that the government sought book purchase records, "the chilling effect would frost keyboards across America."

Our right to read what we choose, free from government intrusion, is too valuable to give up when the government doesn't have a warrant based on probable cause. Reading in private allows people to explore ideas, even those that may be unpopular, and this kind of freedom is both intrinsically valuable and essential to our democracy, which after all is premised on the idea that untrammeled debate and intellectual exploration leads to good government. That is why the ACLU is calling on Congress to pass legislation that would make it clear that the government needs a warrant with notice for all sensitive electronic information, including book records. We hope you will join our efforts.

We intend the comments portion of this blog to be a forum where you can freely express your views on blog postings and on comments made by other people. Given that, please understand that you are responsible for the material you post on the comments portion of this blog. The only postings that we ask that you refrain from posting and that we cannot permit on our website are requests for legal assistance and postings that could cause ACLU to incur legal liability.

One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites.

We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published.

Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section.

2 Responses to "North Carolina Wants to Know What You Bought from Amazon"

  1. Anonymous Says:

    When will someone reveal the truth about what is known as community-based harassment/organized (group) stalking in America?

    It's an outrage, a threat to democracy, and is certainly inconsistent with the Constitution and the rule of law.

  2. Anonymous Says:

    Yeah, NC should be able to find out the value of the items purchased (for sales tax reasons), but finding out the content of what was purchased should only be allowed under extraordinary circumstances.

Comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
 

© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004
This is the Web site of the American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU Foundation.
Learn more about the distinction between these two components of the ACLU.

User Agreement | Privacy Statement | FAQs | Site Map

Statistics image