|
|
Standing Up For Migrants’ Rights In GeorgiaI was joined this morning by other human rights advocates in delivering a human rights resolution to the Gwinnett County Board of Commissioners on the occasion of International Migrants’ Day. The resolution emphasizes the human dignity of all persons, regardless of immigration status, and urges the cessation of local enforcement of immigration laws. We will seek endorsement of the resolution at an upcoming meeting of the Commissioners. December 18th was declared International Migrants Day in year 2000 by members of the General Assembly of the United Nations in support of the rights of migrant workers and their families, an issue championed by the ACLU. The General Assembly passed resolution 55/93 to reflect the UN's adoption of the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families, resolution 45/158, on December 18, 1990. The Migrants Worker Convention guarantees migrant workers and their families’ fundamental rights including: freedom from discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, sex, religion or any other status, in all aspects of work; equality before the law regardless of a migrant's legal status; and freedom from arbitrary expulsion of migrants from their country of employment. The United States has not yet signed or ratified the Migrant Worker Convention. However, the government is not even respecting its obligations under the treaties the U.S. has already ratified, . Earlier this week, the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Human Rights and Law under the guidance of Senators Durbin and Coburn held the first oversight hearing on the domestic implementation of human rights treaty obligations. The hearing focused on how the U.S. government is abiding by its obligations specified in human rights treaties which it has ratified, including the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the Convention on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination. Submissions by human rights organizations including the ACLU and the Rights Working Group served to remind the Subcommittee that the U.S. has yet to implement many of the Concluding Observations of the U.N. Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD), including specific reforms under the Convention on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination to combat racial profiling in the U.S. President Obama vowed on December 10, 2008, the 60th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, “let us rededicate ourselves to the advancement of human rights and freedoms for all, and pledge always to live by the ideals we promote to the world.” It is high time for the Obama administration and states and counties to take concrete steps to abide by this pledge and by their obligations under international human rights treaties by protecting and preserving the human dignity of all persons regardless of their immigration status. On the federal level, this would mean implementing the recommendations of the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, including the introduction and passage of the “End Racial Profiling Act,” strengthening the 2003 DOJ guidance to ban profiling based on religion and national origin and eliminating the loopholes that allow for targeting of individuals on the basis of their race and ethnicity in the name of national security, and repeal of 287(g) programs which delegate immigration enforcement authority to specific local police agencies. On the state level, a first step would be the passage of the anti-racial profiling legislation by the Georgia Legislature to ensure collection of data related to a person’s race and background upon traffic and pedestrian stops and the availability of the data to the public, as well as providing comprehensive annual training for law enforcement regarding racial profiling. On the local level, it would mean the repeal of 287(g) agreements which have led to racial profiling and abuse of power by law enforcement. 287(g) has led to fear and mistrust of law enforcement among immigrant communities, as shown by an ACLU of Georgia report (PDF) released in October 2009, focused on the implementation of the program in Cobb County. The report, which was based on interviews with 10 community members and five community advocates and attorneys, also showed that 287(g) has had a devastating impact on immigrant communities through creating an atmosphere of isolation by the tearing apart of families. Gwinnett County recently became the fifth agency in Georgia to implement a 287(g) agreement, delegating certain immigration enforcement powers to local law enforcement. Immigrants in Gwinnett deserve the rights afforded them by the virtue of their humanity and as reaffirmed by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the international human rights treaties ratified by the U.S. We hope that the Gwinnett Commissioners will take a step towards fulfilling their obligations under international human rights treaties by endorsing the human rights resolution we presented to them this morning.
We intend the comments portion of this blog to be a forum where you can freely express your views on blog postings and on comments made by other people. Given that, please understand that you are responsible for the material you post on the comments portion of this blog. The only postings that we ask that you refrain from posting and that we cannot permit on our website are requests for legal assistance and postings that could cause ACLU to incur legal liability.
One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites. We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published. Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section. 3 Responses to "Standing Up For Migrants’ Rights In Georgia" |
|
|
© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004 |
Dec 26th, 2009 at 11:22am
What I object to are illegal immigrants expecting the same rights as legal immigrants and natural born citizens. They expect our schools to teach in their language. They want free medical care, and many other benefits belong to citizens. The "invasion" has damaged our economy.
Dec 27th, 2009 at 8:26pm
If these animals don't like it they can go back to rock they came out from under!!!!!!!!!
Jan 3rd, 2010 at 12:53pm
Animals you say? God created us all. What a bigot you are.