AG Holder: Uphold Immigrants' Right to CounselIn an amicus brief submitted to Attorney General Holder today, the ACLU asked Holder to vacate and reconsider a legal opinion issued by Attorney General Mukasey that stripped immigrants of the right to reopen cases they’ve lost due to their lawyers’ mistakes. In the waning days of the Bush administration, Attorney General Mukasey issued this last-minute decision curtailing immigrants’ right to due process, increasing the likelihood that immigrants who are legally eligible to remain in the United States will be deported due to immigration decisions that are based on the mistakes of an incompetent attorney rather than on the facts or the law. Attorney General Mukasey’s decision was a major shift from what had been the practice in both the immigration courts and federal courts of protecting the due process rights of immigrants. Due process prohibits deporting an immigrant simply because her lawyer had violated the duty to provide effective representation through fraud or incompetent mistakes. Existing law had clearly recognized that principle and provided protection that the Bush Administration has tried to eliminate with the Mukasey decision. Due process protection is especially important for immigrants because their limited English-language skills and lack of knowledge of the U.S. legal system can make them particularly vulnerable to unscrupulous and incompetent attorneys. We are very hopeful that Attorney General Holder will vacate Mukasey’s opinion and reconsider it, as he has made it clear that he understands that due process demands that immigrants receive a fair hearing. In his confirmation hearings, he indicated, in response to questions from Senator Hatch (PDF) and Senator Feingold (PDF), that he is willing to reexamine Mukasey’s decision because “[t]he Constitution guarantees due process of law to those who are the subjects of deportation proceedings.” We have therefore asked that Attorney General Holder quickly exercise his authority to ensure that this parting insult to due process from the Bush administration not be allowed to stand.
We intend the comments portion of this blog to be a forum where you can freely express your views on blog postings and on comments made by other people. Given that, please understand that you are responsible for the material you post on the comments portion of this blog. The only postings that we ask that you refrain from posting and that we cannot permit on our website are requests for legal assistance and postings that could cause ACLU to incur legal liability.
One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites. We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published. Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section. 4 Responses to "AG Holder: Uphold Immigrants' Right to Counsel" |
|
© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004 |
Feb 8th, 2009 at 11:18am
We are all 'Immigrants' and the
'Progeny' of Immigrants. We hypocrit-
ically promote 'freedom' and 'justice'
as well as 'equality' the world over-
yet when it comes to our great and wonderful neighbors in 'Mexico'-the
'Welcome to America' mat is 'rolled-
up'-the 'Fences-Border Patrol-and Guns
come out'! Reverse 'Mukasey's miguidance
and 'uphold Immigrants rights' in the courts'. Return 'Humanity' to all 'Immi-
grants'-'Mexican-Nationals' included-do
not condone discrimination, inequality
and racial profiling in the United States Court Systems-it is 'unconscion-
able'...That is the 'Right and Fair'
and 'only approach' in our 'Immigration
System'!!!
Mar 2nd, 2009 at 9:01am
I would like to see Ellis Island brought back in order to let those in that are healthy, want to be here and do not want to bring harm to our great nation. My ancestors had to come in that way so i see no reason why that cant be done again.
Mar 3rd, 2009 at 2:37pm
To create more jobs, Obama should send every non-US Citizen back to their homeland. If you do not want to become an American, then go home. You have no rights. Learn our language. Our country would be financial stronger if we didn't have to pay for all these free loaders. They are raping our medical, social, education and labor programs.
They get more than hard working Americans. BUILD THE WALL 2009.
Mar 5th, 2009 at 1:04pm
What you call "Illegal Imigrants" are actually foreign nationals that have invaded our country. They have no rights other than those granted under the Geneva Convention. Consider what type treatment "Invaders" from a japanese landing force in 1942 would have received if they landed on the CA coast These current invaders should receive the same treatment.