www.aclu.orgJOIN THE ACLUTAKE ACTIONABOUT US
ACLU Blog of Rights - Official Blog of the ACLU National Office American Civil Liberties Union Homepage Blog of Rights Homepage Support the ACLU
Feb 25th, 2010
Posted by Ankit Rastogi, Immigrants' Rights Project at 4:26pm

DHS Immigrant Dragnet Yields Sorry Results

A Washington Post article on Monday reports that Secure Communities, an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) jail screening program, has gotten “high marks” in anti-immigration quarters. Under the Secure Communities program, jails run all arrestees’ fingerprints through not only criminal databases, but also immigration databases. This screening happens even if the local prosecutor decides there’s no basis for a criminal charge. Based on the results of the database search, ICE may decide to detain the person upon release by the local agency.

Originally, Secure Communities was designed to apprehend individuals who have been convicted of major drug offenses and violent offenses, but the results have shown quite the opposite result: a report from the Immigration Policy Center stated that from October 2008 to February 2009, only 7.2 percent of criminal aliens identified by the program were convicted of these major offenses. A September 2009 report by the Warren Institute on Race, Ethnicity, and Diversity examined a similar jail screening program by ICE called the Criminal Alien Program (CAP) as it was carried out in Irving, Texas. Over a 15-month period, only 2 percent of the detainers ICE issued through CAP were for individuals with felony offenses. Clearly, DHS maintains a poor track record in prioritizing the removal of “dangerous criminal aliens.”

Advocates for Secure Communities claim that it won’t lead to racial profiling because every arrestee’s fingerprints are run through the database when they are booked into the jail. But the Warren Institute report discovered that when the local police knew that jail screening would take place, they dramatically increased their arrests of Latinos, particularly for minor misdemeanor charges. Jail screenings have clearly led to racial profiling as local officers target “foreign-looking” motorists for traffic stops. Officers know that whether ICE takes the person into custody or the person turns out to be a U.S. citizen or lawful immigrant, if they can just sweep as many individuals as possible into the local jail, criminal charges can later be dropped and the officer will never be held to account for the unlawful stops.

Quite contrary to the program’s name, Secure Communities has the potential to greatly reduce public safety. As leaders in law enforcement like Los Angeles police chief William Bratton have pointed out, when local police focus on immigration enforcement, they are diverted from pursuing violent crimes and lose community trust. As a result, crimes go unreported and witnesses won’t come forward. As the article mentions, Secure Communities has a “lower profile” — so low-profile that some law enforcement agencies may be unaware that ICE intends to take the program to every county jail in the country by 2013. For those police chiefs and sheriffs who have prioritized catching serious criminals rather than immigration violators, this may be unwelcome news.

We intend the comments portion of this blog to be a forum where you can freely express your views on blog postings and on comments made by other people. Given that, please understand that you are responsible for the material you post on the comments portion of this blog. The only postings that we ask that you refrain from posting and that we cannot permit on our website are requests for legal assistance and postings that could cause ACLU to incur legal liability.

One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites.

We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published.

Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section.

Comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
 

© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004
This is the Web site of the American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU Foundation.
Learn more about the distinction between these two components of the ACLU.

User Agreement | Privacy Statement | FAQs | Site Map

Statistics image