www.aclu.orgJOIN THE ACLUTAKE ACTIONABOUT US
ACLU Blog of Rights - Official Blog of the ACLU National Office American Civil Liberties Union Homepage Blog of Rights Homepage Support the ACLU
Jun 10th, 2010
Posted by Ian Thompson, Washington Legislative Office at 5:27pm

Blood Donation Ban for Gay and Bisexual Men Under Review

Current FDA policy permanently bars any man who has ever, even once, had sex with another man since 1977 from donating blood in the United States.

That's all gay and bisexual men regardless of their individual sexual histories or HIV risk. For example, the fact that an individual gay man is in a committed, monogamous relationship would not matter under the blanket ban.

Other individuals who are also at increased risk for HIV disease, however, including people who have heterosexual sex with someone who they know to be HIV-positive, or people who have had sex with a commercial sex worker, are prevented from donating blood for only a year.

All blood donors are required to fill out a donor history questionnaire that covers a wide range of conditions and practices. Question 34, which asks: "Male donors – From 1977 to the present, have you had sexual contact with another male, even once?" That pretty much spells the end of the line for any gay or bisexual man wishing to donate blood.

The current policy establishing different standards for behavior that poses similar (or greater) risk of HIV transmission has been criticized as stigmatizing and discriminatory to gay and bisexual men. In recent years, the policy has been criticized by the American Red Cross, the American Association of Blood Banks and America's Blood Centers as "scientifically and medically unwarranted."

In written comments to the Advisory Committee on Blood Safety and Availability, which is currently reviewing the policy at meetings on Thursday and Friday, the ACLU urges the Committee to make its decision based on actual scientific evidence, rather than outdated stereotypes or assumptions about gay and bisexual men. If the evidence suggests that the policy could be changed without posing greater risks to the nation's blood supply, continuing to treat gay and bisexual men differently would pose serious constitutional concerns.

In a new report from the Williams Institute at UCLA School of Law, researchers estimated that lifting the ban on gay and bisexual male blood and organ donors could add 219,000 pints to the nation's blood supply each year and make more than 900 organs available for donation. These numbers are hard to ignore, particularly in light of shortages of available donors.

Those who are interested can tune in and watch the Committee's meetings on this issue live via webcast. The public comment session will take place on Friday, June 11. Additionally, be sure to check aclu.org for updates following the meetings as the review of the ban progresses.

We intend the comments portion of this blog to be a forum where you can freely express your views on blog postings and on comments made by other people. Given that, please understand that you are responsible for the material you post on the comments portion of this blog. The only postings that we ask that you refrain from posting and that we cannot permit on our website are requests for legal assistance and postings that could cause ACLU to incur legal liability.

One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites.

We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published.

Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section.

2 Responses to "Blood Donation Ban for Gay and Bisexual Men Under Review"

  1. Anonymous Says:

    No one wants your tainted blood in the emergency room or on the battlefield.

  2. Corina Says:

    To anonymous: Your blood must be rotting. It is a shame you are allowed to donate! Pig!

Comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
 

© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004
This is the Web site of the American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU Foundation.
Learn more about the distinction between these two components of the ACLU.

User Agreement | Privacy Statement | FAQs | Site Map

Statistics image