LGBT Project Director Matt Coles Answers Your Questions About the California InitiativeOn May 15, the California Supreme Court ruled that the state may no longer exclude same-sex couples from marriage. But anti-gay forces have gotten enough signatures to put on the November ballot an initiative that would amend the state Constitution and overrule the decision. I’ve been getting a lot of questions about the initiative in California, so I decided to put together some of the most common with my answers. Hope you find this helpful. Do voters have the power to overrule the courts on what the Constitution means? Yes, on the meaning of the state Constitution. The California Supreme Court ruled that excluding same-sex couples from marriage violated the California State Constitution. (Most of the time, when we talk about “the Constitution,” we mean the United States Constitution, the document that created the federal government. But every state has its own constitution.) The California Constitution specifically allows voters to change it by a simple majority vote (not every state allows that). If the voters change the constitution to say that marriages can only be between a man and woman, that will most likely be read as modifying the more general “equal protection” and “due process” sections of the California Constitution that were the basis of the Court’s decision. Why did the Court base its decision on the California Constitution and not the United States Constitution? So that it, and not the U.S. Supreme Court, would have the last word. If the Court had ruled that the United States Constitution did not allow same-sex couples to be excluded from marriage, voters would not be able to overrule the decision. An amendment to the U.S. Constitution has to be passed by two-thirds of both houses of Congress and ratified by three-fourths of the state legislatures. But a decision based on the U.S. Constitution could be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. A decision based on the California Constitution cannot, because a state Supreme Court has final say on the meaning of a state constitution. Because the U.S. Supreme Court has been taking a pretty narrow view of civil rights, we asked the California Supreme Court to consider only the California Constitution. How can we save the Court’s decision? We can win the election. The polls say it’s possible. The Field poll (PDF), the best poll in California, says we’re ahead. If LGBT people do these three things, we’ll win:
We intend the comments portion of this blog to be a forum where you can freely express your views on blog postings and on comments made by other people. Given that, please understand that you are responsible for the material you post on the comments portion of this blog. The only postings that we ask that you refrain from posting and that we cannot permit on our website are requests for legal assistance and postings that could cause ACLU to incur legal liability.
One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites. We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published. Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section. 1 Response to "LGBT Project Director Matt Coles Answers Your Questions About the California Initiative " |
|
© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004 |
Jun 7th, 2008 at 12:10pm
thanks for this informative piece
http://www.queersunited.blogspot.com