www.aclu.orgJOIN THE ACLUTAKE ACTIONABOUT US
ACLU Blog of Rights - Official Blog of the ACLU National Office American Civil Liberties Union Homepage Blog of Rights Homepage Support the ACLU
Dec 31st, 2009
Posted by Sam Ritchie, LGBT Project at 5:10pm

State Legislative Round-Up: Youth & Schools and Transgender

Just as the school year ended, Oregon passed a law adding sexual orientation and gender identity/expression to its anti-bullying law, becoming the seventh state to specifically protect LGBT students from harassment. One month later, North Carolina became the eighth state to do so, when Governor Beverly Purdue signed that state’s first anti-bullying law. The Minnesota legislature passed a similar bill, but it was vetoed by Governor Tim Pawlenty, who had previously said he would sign it. The New York Assembly passed LGBT-specific anti-bullying legislation, but the bill died in the Senate. Bills were also introduced in Arizona, Michigan, Missouri and Virginia.

Legislators in Hawaii overrode a veto from Governor Linda Lingle to pass a law requiring comprehensive, medically accurate sex education in public schools. A similar law was passed and signed in Oregon. A law passed in North Carolina will require information on condoms and prevention of sexually-transmitted infections to be included in the state’s otherwise abstinence-only curriculum. Bills requiring medically accurate sexuality education were also introduced in Arizona, Florida, Indiana, Mississippi and Virginia. A bill was also introduced in Indiana which would require schools teaching abstinence-only sex education to notify parents and allow them to opt-out.

Bills that would require parental permission for student participation in school clubs were introduced in Missouri and Oklahoma, though neither passed. These bills are generally seen as targeting gay-straight alliances (GSAs). Tennessee considered, but did not pass, a bill that would ban any mention of homosexuality in K-8 schools. Arizona considered a non-discrimination bill for children in foster care, which includes LGBT protections. In a particularly heinous move, a South Carolina legislator successfully amended a teen dating violence prevention bill to apply only to opposite-sex couples. The underlying bill died in committee.

Transgender

Bills that would have added transgender protections to existing non-discrimination laws passed the New York Assembly and New Hampshire House, but both bills failed in the Senate of their respective states. Similar bills were introduced in Connecticut, Massachusetts and Maryland.

A bill adding protections for transgender people under state hate crimes laws was passed in Washington. Because Washington’s anti-bullying bill relies on the classes outlined in the hate crimes law, this legislation will also protect transgender students from harassment at school. A bill adding transgender people to the Texas hate crimes law was introduced but never taken up.

Tennessee considered, but did not pass, a pair of bills which would have repealed the state’s ban on changing gender markers on the birth certificates of transgender individuals and would have established a procedure to make such a change. A bill which would have prevented judges from prohibiting sexual reassignment surgery as a condition for custody of a minor child was introduced but not passed in New York.

We intend the comments portion of this blog to be a forum where you can freely express your views on blog postings and on comments made by other people. Given that, please understand that you are responsible for the material you post on the comments portion of this blog. The only postings that we ask that you refrain from posting and that we cannot permit on our website are requests for legal assistance and postings that could cause ACLU to incur legal liability.

One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites.

We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published.

Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section.

8 Responses to "State Legislative Round-Up: Youth & Schools and Transgender"

  1. roald Says:

    A few rays of light as we come out of the darkness of the last decade.

  2. Gemma Fournier Says:

    It is just rather unfortunate and almost a tragedy that we have to have laws like this in the first place. If discipline were allowed and if parents and teachers really taught the relationship between cause and effect then maybe we wouldn't be in this situation. casino online

  3. MIchelle French Says:

    Our schools, our world has gone to Hell in a hand basket. When some ignorant individual decided to take God out of the the public schools, out of our court systems, that's when the world went to Hell.

  4. Paen Says:

    The right wingers rave about family values but once again it's the left that is protecting the rights of kids.

  5. Muiks Says:

    I find the statement that these intolerant right-wingers are completely against government regulation of private lives to be extremely hypocritical

  6. Kevin Kim Says:

    Paen(#4), radical-leftists like you toying with words makes me sick... "protecting the rights of kids"? If the left had their way, there would be no kids to protect in the first place... you liberals love aborting them!

  7. Paen Says:

    Kevin it's people who think for themselves that makes you sick.

  8. An\ Says:

    The government destroys the relationships between parents to their children online poker

Comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
 

© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004
This is the Web site of the American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU Foundation.
Learn more about the distinction between these two components of the ACLU.

User Agreement | Privacy Statement | FAQs | Site Map

Statistics image