|
|
Another Victim of Ideological Exclusion?Over the weekend, it was reported that renowned Columbian journalist Hollman Morris — one of 12 international journalists selected to participate in the prestigious Nieman fellowship program at Harvard University during the 2010–11 academic year — has been denied a visa by the State department. The U.S. embassy in Bogota informed him that he has been found permanently ineligible for a visa under the Immigration and Nationality Act. Today, the ACLU, American Association of University Professors and PEN American Center sent a letter to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to express alarm over this apparent incident of ideological exclusion — a practice under which foreign nationals are denied entry to the United States because the government does not agree with their political views. Earlier this year, Secretary Clinton signed orders effectively lifting the exclusion of prominent scholars Adam Habib and Tariq Ramadan, who were excluded by the Bush administration. We had hoped that Secretary Clinton’s orders signaled a broader commitment to ending the practice of ideological exclusion, but the Hollman Morris case makes us wonder whether the practice has actually been retired. The letter we sent today states: No legitimate interest is served by the exclusion of foreign nationals on ideological grounds. Ideological exclusion impoverishes intellectual inquiry and debate in the United States, suggests to the world that our country is more interested in silencing than engaging its critics, and undermines our ability to support dissent in politically repressive nations. Yesterday, Alex Gibney, Academy Award-winning director of Taxi to the Dark Side, re-released this short video about Morris's work. Gibney writes in The Atlantic: "What kind of message is the Obama administration sending? Work for human rights and you are not welcome here?" Join us in standing up for the First Amendment: Tell Secretary Clinton to end the practice of ideological exclusion once and for all. |
|
|
© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004 |
One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites.
We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published.
Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section.