Anthony Romero on Salon RadioOn Monday, ACLU Executive Director Anthony D. Romero talked with Glenn Greenwald about our new Close Gitmo campaign, and why it's so important that President-elect Obama close Guantánamo on Day One. Namely, this can happen with the stroke of a pen. Unlike fixing health care, the war in Iraq, the economy and the environment, President Obama can literally close Guantánamo and shut down the military commissions system with an executive order. Anthony points out that the prison camp was opened with an executive order; it can be closed that way too. MeteorBlades started a terrific discussion on DailyKos on the likelihood of President Obama accomplishing this on Day One. And on Invictus, Valtin discusses why creating a whole new system of justice to try the Guantánamo detainees is completely unnecessary. We couldn't agree more. In fact, we discussed this last April after a New Yorker article raised the possibility of "national security court," and commented on it again Monday. Anthony also explains how our current justice system is already equipped to deal with the prosecution of terrorism suspects in the Salon interview: We understand that these cases may represent different legal theories than the thug on the street who picked up my wallet, right? We have procedures in place to deal with them. We have the Classified Information Procedures Act, which allows us to put evidence before judges and make sure that if they're classified or if they represent issues on national security they're not broadcast to the public, therefore jeopardizing national security further. We have ways of making sure that witnesses are protected in coming forward, so that they're not open to further attacks by other terrorists who might be still out there.Our system of justice has served us well for a long time. Now isn't the time to reinvent the wheel—again.
Tags: Close Guantanamo
We intend the comments portion of this blog to be a forum where you can freely express your views on blog postings and on comments made by other people. Given that, please understand that you are responsible for the material you post on the comments portion of this blog. The only postings that we ask that you refrain from posting and that we cannot permit on our website are requests for legal assistance and postings that could cause ACLU to incur legal liability.
One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites. We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published. Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section. 1 Response to "Anthony Romero on Salon Radio" |
|
© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004 |
Nov 14th, 2008 at 2:23pm
I completely agree that closing Guantanamo Bay would be an important signal to Americans and the world that human rights and due process are once again the drivers of the official conduct of the US government.
I would also like reassurance in the form of a definite plan and process for closure that ensures that due process is applied. Hopefully, that will also help achieve justice. I understand that justice can be an elusive goal but I believe that is the most grievous casualty of past eight years.
Consistent with that objective, constitutional guarantees for due process should be explicitly enforced and, where they have been eroded, e.g. the Military Commissions Act, corrective actions implemented.
Can all of that be done on Jan 20th or enough of it to confidently move forward?