www.aclu.orgJOIN THE ACLUTAKE ACTIONDONATEABOUT US
ACLU Blog of Rights - Official Blog of the ACLU National Office Blog of Rights Homepage Support the ACLU

Join Us At:

Dec 20th, 2007 Google Bookmarks Technorati StumbleUpon Digg! Reddit Delicious Facebook
Posted by Laurie Beacham, ACLU at 12:23pm

The CIA Has a "Very Serious Problem"

It’s been two weeks since we learned that the CIA secretly destroyed at least two videotapes of its “enhanced interrogations” of terror suspects. At issue is the possible criminality of both the tapes’ destruction and what the tapes might show – like torture.

There are several investigations being launched into the CIA’s decision to destroy the tapes – from congressional committees, the Justice Department, and the CIA. Because the Bush administration can hardly be trusted to investigate itself, and because Congress’ track record of holding administration officials accountable has been unimpressive at best, a special prosecutor is desperately needed.

In addition to these investigations, the destruction of the tapes is at issue in a few court cases. In a case brought on behalf of Guantánamo detainees, Justice Henry H. Kennedy - despite being warned off by the Justice Department - has called a hearing for tomorrow addressing the fact that he had ordered evidence in the case – including of detainee treatment of Guantánamo detainees – not be destroyed. Good for him.

A second case is a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit brought by the ACLU in which the ACLU requested documentation of U.S. treatment and abuse of detainees overseas – not limited to Guantánamo. Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein ordered the government to produce all responsive information. Yet, in blatant disregard of that order, the CIA destroyed the videotapes that clearly fall into the scope of the ACLU’s request.

The ACLU has asked Judge Hellerstein to hold the CIA in contempt of court. It has also asked that the government be ordered to produce documentation regarding the decision to destroy the tapes, including from the White House and the FBI.

The ACLU’s case has been characterized as perhaps the strongest. For why it might provide the CIA with a “very serious problem” and might “force the Bush administration’s hand,” see John Dean’s recent piece: www.alternet.org/story/70797/

In our troubled democracy where the critical element of separation of powers is regularly attacked by the Bush administration, let’s hope our courts are allowed and willing to provide the crucial oversight of this administration that is so sorely needed.

CORRECTION: An earlier version of this post linked "Freedom of Information Act lawsuit brought by the ACLU" to the wrong page. It should go to www.aclu.org/torturefoia, not www.aclu.org/nsafoia.

Google Bookmarks Technorati StumbleUpon Digg! Reddit Delicious Facebook
We intend the comments portion of this blog to be a forum where you can freely express your views on blog postings and on comments made by other people. Given that, please understand that you are responsible for the material you post on the comments portion of this blog. The only postings that we ask that you refrain from posting and that we cannot permit on our website are requests for legal assistance and postings that could cause ACLU to incur legal liability.

One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites.

We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published.

Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image. Ignore spaces and be careful about upper and lower case.
 

Quicksearch


© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004
This is the Web site of the American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU Foundation.
Learn more about the distinction between these two components of the ACLU.

User Agreement | Privacy Statement | FAQs | Site Map

Statistics image