Freedom of Expression in the Post-Bush EraThis month’s issue of Index on Censorship, a British magazine that promotes freedom of expression, considers the future of free expression in the U.S. after the Presidency of George W. Bush. The issue entitled “Mission Accomplished? The Bush Legacy” features several articles from leading activists, writers and journalists that examine the culture of secrecy, surveillance and executive authority associated with the Bush administration.
Steven Aftergood, director of the Federation of American Scientists Project on Government Secrecy and author of Secrecy News writes about the many steps that will need to be taken in the months and years to come to tackle the unprecedented growth in secrecy under Bush in his article “If In Doubt, Classify” (PDF). Patrick Radden Keefe, author of Chatter: Dispatched from the Secret World of Global Eavesdropping and frequent contributor to The New Yorker and Slate considers the lack of oversight of the Bush administration’s wiretapping program in his article “Legislating in the Dark” (PDF). And the Director of the ACLU’s National Security Project, Jameel Jaffer, writes about the many remaining secrets of the Bush administration, particularly in regard to detention and interrogation policies, in his article “Unfinished Business” (PDF). Jaffer discusses the ACLU’s ongoing Freedom of Information Act litigation that seeks to unearth documents about the abuse and torture of prisoners. He writes: The information that has been released thus far is incomplete, but it paints a grim picture. We know that the administration’s lawyers invented a new legal framework…meant to permit barbaric interrogation practices and to insulate interrogators and officials from prosecution for war crimes. We know that, in reliance on this new legal framework, interrogators subjected prisoners to abuse and even torture…[A]buse of prisoners was systemic, not limited to Abu Ghraib… [H]undreds of prisoners have died in the custody of US military and … many other have disappeared into the CIA’s secret detention system…You can read these articles and several others online.
Tags: national security project
We intend the comments portion of this blog to be a forum where you can freely express your views on blog postings and on comments made by other people. Given that, please understand that you are responsible for the material you post on the comments portion of this blog. The only postings that we ask that you refrain from posting and that we cannot permit on our website are requests for legal assistance and postings that could cause ACLU to incur legal liability.
One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites. We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published. Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section. 3 Responses to "Freedom of Expression in the Post-Bush Era" |
|
© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004 |
Dec 10th, 2008 at 4:08pm
Justina Coleman
8230 S Hermitage Ave 1
Chicago IL 60620
Jc66202@gmail.com
312-513-3248
773-434-0745
Violation of Civil, Human and Privacy rights by my Ex-Employer Carl A Pellettieri,
Ronald A Hennings, Sandy Schade and MeriMed Revenue Group
991 Oak Creek Dr
Lombard IL 60148-6408
630-424-4000
The state of Illinois prohibit employers from gathering and maintaining information regarding an employee’s off-premises political, religious and other non-businesses activities without the employee’s written consent.
US post office 8345 S Ashland Ave who opened mail, threw away mail or forwarded.
I mailed documents to your office December 4 2008 since contacting you my email and mail has been compromised. They are becoming more aggressive.
My life is in jeopardy, they are afraid of my revealing what has been happening for the last 7 years.
I am attending the Southwest One-Stop Career Center located at 7500 S Pulaski.
Building 100 Chicago IL 60652.
Someone needs to interview counselors at the center.
Wiretapping
Stalking
Attempted murder
Tapping with the US mail
Attorney acquiring personal information without my written consent
Bribing Judges, Attorneys, polices, and city clerks.
Violation of Civil, Human and Privacy rights by my Ex-Employer Carl A Pellettieri,
Ronald A Hennings, Sandy Schade and MeriMed Revenue Group
991 Oak Creek Dr
Lombard IL 60148-6408
630-424-4000
The state of Illinois prohibit employers from gathering and maintaining information regarding an employee’s off-premises political, religious and other non-businesses activities without the employee’s written consent. My ex-employer Carl A Pellettieri, Ronald A Henning, have broken this law for the last 7 years. They have paid security agencies, and their client’s employees to stalk me outside of work 7 days a week from 2001 and have continued even thought I no longer work for the company to the present. They have slandered my name, committed defamation of character and other unspeakable actions violating my civil, human and privacy rights.
I would like to know the explanation they are giving people to break the law are they bribing people, what is the lie they are telling that I am not allowed to defend myself against. I now believe that my life is in jeopardy, I believe now they are ready to commit murder to stop me from talking.
Illinois Dept of Employment Security 837 W 119th st Harold Thompson 189
Citibank in Lombard and Chicago who gave ex-employers my account information
Malcolm X College Margie Jackson
Chicago Police Dept told to harass me for no reason
US post office 8345 S Ashland Ave who opened mail, threw away mail or forwarded
Cook County hospital that illegally sold medical and test information to ex-employers
Chicago Kent College of Law
Josh Friedman Attorney at Law
Legal Assistance Foundation Timothy Hauszer
Caffarelli & Siegel Jessica Fayerman who made copies of documents
Comcast Cable communication
Chicago Dept of Revenue Arnold Scott Harris P C Ticket Fraud
Chicago Workforce Center Southwest and Mid-South
Dec 10th, 2008 at 4:10pm
help me
Feb 19th, 2009 at 7:06pm
Someone from this number 630-xxx-xxxx called me and did not leave a message. After reading this I am pretty scared! I am no way affiliated with the above person. What the heck is going on in this country?