The same day President Bush made another pitch for telecom immunity in the
current FISA Bill before the House,
Roll Call reported that the GOP is miffed that the President's and House and Senate Republicans' lobbying on behalf of the telcos isn't raking in nearly enough love in the form of contributions to the party. The paper writes:
"GOP leadership aides are grumbling that their party isn't getting more political money from the telecommunications industry."
"...It's quite discouraging," said one GOP leadership aide, referring to the disparity in giving from the telecommunications industry in light of the FISA debate, but also the broader lack of support for Republicans from the business community in general."
"...In a closed-door session earlier this week, House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) exhorted his colleagues to get off their "dead asses" and start raising money for the party. Fully 142 of them have not yet pledged or contributed funds to the NRCC.
Incidentally, it's Rep. Boehner who
keeps trotting out the telcom lawsuits as a cash cow for trial lawyers line. We guess that's his special method of fundraising: lying.
Roll Call points that only Sprint donates more to Dems than Republicans, and that "[t]he other three companies, AT&T, Verizon and Qwest, still give a majority to Republicans but by slimmer margins than in years past." It's worth noting that
Qwest is not suspected of participating in the NSA wiretap program, and is not lobbying for telecom immunity in the current FISA legislation before the House.
One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites.
We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published.
Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section.