CategoriesJoin Us At:
|
Is it Torture When Americans Are Waterboarded?John Yoo spit out a familiar, Mukasey-esque answer when Bill Delahunt (D-Mass.) asked if waterboarding is torture if it's an American soldier being waterboarded. Yoo answers: "My view now is that it would depend on the circumstances."
We intend the comments portion of this blog to be a forum where you can freely express your views on blog postings and on comments made by other people. Given that, please understand that you are responsible for the material you post on the comments portion of this blog. The only postings that we ask that you refrain from posting and that we cannot permit on our website are requests for legal assistance and postings that could cause ACLU to incur legal liability.
One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites. We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published. Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section. 6 Responses to "Is it Torture When Americans Are Waterboarded?" |
|
© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004 |
Jun 26th, 2008 at 11:54pm
Seems like the next logical question would have been - "Mr. Yoo, is would you consider waterboarding to be torture if it was performed on you?"
Jun 27th, 2008 at 9:48am
Worrying about Yoo's response here is in a sense beneath the ACLU. Torture of a human, American or otherwise, is unethical and ought to be (and IS) illegal.
Jun 27th, 2008 at 3:41pm
I'm a U.S. Citizen and the government has been behind torturing me for years.
Jun 28th, 2008 at 5:07pm
No, it is not torture when an American is waterboarded because waterboarding is not torture.
Now if we were to cut their testicals off, or decapitate them on video, or burn them alive, or stone them, I might think differently. But we don't do that do we?
Stop bitching about us and start bitching about what they are doing to ANYONE that disagrees with their "God".
I do not understand why the ACLU does not strongly condemn Terrorists.
Jun 29th, 2008 at 9:33am
Hey Bob,
You couldn't have said it better had you been the ghost of Augusto Pinochet...
As the name ACLU denotes, it's primary mission is to ensure that the U.S. lives up to it's constitutional ideals. Obvious to everyone (including the ACLU) is the fact that terrorism, regardless of who perpetrates it, is repugnant and offensive.
As far as waterboarding is concerned, anytime you coerce a "confession" using means that induce extreme physical or mental anguish (such as fear of drowning) you are torturing someone. Furthermore, as so many former interrogators have rightly pointed out, you risk obtaining false confessions and misleading information, simply to make the torture stop.
Most reasonable people (including the ACLU), have no sympathy for terrorists or their methods. The ACLU and other like minded organizations are merely trying to ensure that the U.S. does not adopt the standards of those it purports to oppose.
Jan 5th, 2009 at 1:37pm
Thanks to ACLU for bringing Mr. John Yoo’s 3/14/03 memo to light. I included an attack on his legal interpretation of the federal maiming statute were in my 10/13/08 complaint to the FBI regarding exposures to World Trade Center toxics, which I will send on request (jenkins.cate@epa.gov). Mr. You claimed that only certain body parts, the limbs or extremities, were prohibited from intentional mutilation, thus justifying waterboarding as not covered under the maiming laws. Mr. Yoo conveniently omitted the phrase “any member” that is also contained in the U.S. Title 18 language, thus making it appear on the face that his interpretation was correct. In 2006, the U.S. Dept. of Justice issued a document giving the correct interpretation of the maiming statute as covering all parts of the body.