www.aclu.orgJOIN THE ACLUTAKE ACTIONDONATEABOUT US
ACLU Blog of Rights - Official Blog of the ACLU National Office Blog of Rights Homepage Support the ACLU

Join Us At:

May 27th, 2008 Google Bookmarks Technorati StumbleUpon Digg! Reddit Delicious Facebook
Posted by Suzanne Ito, ACLU at 09:37am

Khadr Finds Justice at Canadian High Court

On Friday, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC), in a 9-0 decision, ruled that Canadian officials violated the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms — analogous to the American Bill of Rights — by turning over their interrogation records of Canadian citizen Omar Khadr to the United States. Khadr, the Guantánamo detainee who was 15 when he was shot and captured by U.S. forces in Afghanistan in July 2002, is currently being prosecuted in the Guantánamo military commissions. His case is still in pre-trial hearings, which started this spring. The SCC ordered the Canadian federal government to provide Khadr's defense counsel the information Canadian agents got out of a 2003 interrogation session at Guantánamo so the information can be used in his defense. The SCC added:
"the conditions under which Mr. Khadr was held and was liable for prosecution were illegal under both U.S. and international law at the time Canadian officials interviewed Mr. Khadr and gave information to U.S. authorities"
ACLU Staff Attorney Hina Shamsi was in Guantánamo this earlier this year to observe one of Khadr's pre-trial hearings. She says:
"The decision is the latest event to call into question how the government has handled and represented Khadr's detention and prosecution. At a hearing I attended earlier this year, a secret government document, disclosed by mistake, made clear that Khadr wasn't the only person who could have thrown a grenade that killed a U.S. soldier, which is the public account the government has long given. Instead, according to the document, another person was alive in the compound in which Khadr was captured, and Khadr himself was wounded even before a U.S. service member or official found him and shot him in the back, twice.
More recently, we found out that in January 2003, shortly after Khadr was captured, military officials wrote a document that recommended children under 18 not be held in Guantánamo and that recognized child detainees are entitled to special treatment. Given these revelations, it's all the more important that Khadr's lawyers have access to interview notes and other information Canadian officials have, which they shared with the U.S. government, but wanted to keep from the defendant." Khadr's attorneys have been working to try to persuade the Canadian government to act on its countryman's behalf.
"I think the most important aspect of it is that the Supreme Court has said that Guantánamo Bay is illegal," said Lieutenant-Commander Bill Kuebler, Mr. Khadr's U.S. military lawyer. "And yet the Canadian government continues to do nothing to intervene on behalf of Omar Khadr."
The military commission system continues to stumble along, even as top cabinet officials recognize its flaws and admit the damage it is doing to the United States' reputation around the world. Canada has recognized that the system is unlawful, and based its decision on U.S. Supreme Court precedent. It's time to close Guantánamo.
Google Bookmarks Technorati StumbleUpon Digg! Reddit Delicious Facebook
We intend the comments portion of this blog to be a forum where you can freely express your views on blog postings and on comments made by other people. Given that, please understand that you are responsible for the material you post on the comments portion of this blog. The only postings that we ask that you refrain from posting and that we cannot permit on our website are requests for legal assistance and postings that could cause ACLU to incur legal liability.

One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites.

We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published.

Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section.

1 Response to "Khadr Finds Justice at Canadian High Court"

  1. Paul in KY Says:

    Thank God some country's supreme court still has a sense of honor & is not comprised of at least 5 political hacks.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image. Ignore spaces and be careful about upper and lower case.
 

Quicksearch


© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004
This is the Web site of the American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU Foundation.
Learn more about the distinction between these two components of the ACLU.

User Agreement | Privacy Statement | FAQs | Site Map

Statistics image