ACLU Staff attorney Amrit Singh
filed another dispatch from Guantanamo for DailyKos, this time about the ongoing pretrial hearings of Canadian detainee Omar Khadr.

As
we mentioned yesterday, Judge Sam Brownback pointed out that the prosecution's refusal to turn over to the defense team the treatment logs detailing Khadr's detention at Gitmo is preventing the case from going to trial. Col. Brownback is
giving the government until May 22 to turn over these logs. Amrit describes the pretrial proceedings:
In a signed, nine-page affidavit filed in March, [Khadr] describes charges of abuse at the hands of U.S. interrogators, saying that he was repeatedly interrogated while he was in excruciating pain, hooded and menaced by barking dogs, and threatened with rape.
The U.S. Army's Criminal Investigation Division's (CID) documents corroborate these claims of abuse. But even more revealing is Amrit's account of a cover-up that was revealed at yesterday's hearing:
Lt. Cmdr. Bill Kuebler, stated in court that a U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Division (CID) report into Khadr's abuse at Bagram includes a statement by 'Sergeant P.' corroborating Khadr's claim that he was left standing in Bagram for hours on end with his hands extended above his head and chained to the ceiling. ... The CID investigation was however abruptly discontinued when it ran across 'Sergeant C' and found that he was the subject of a court martial investigation. According to Kuebler, 'Sergeant C,' who also interrogated Khadr, was one of the most aggressive interrogators at Bagram and was implicated in the homicide deaths of prisoners there. Kuebler believes that the CID investigation was deliberately 'killed' to prevent the military commission proceedings in Khadr's case from unraveling.
So while the prosecution isn't undermining its own case by refusing to hand over documents, the Army is doing what it can to cover up its torture and abuse of detainees. As
Amrit said yesterday, "this is what's being presented as American justice."
That's the real shame.
One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites.
We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published.
Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section.