www.aclu.orgJOIN THE ACLUTAKE ACTIONDONATEABOUT US
ACLU Blog of Rights - Official Blog of the ACLU National Office Blog of Rights Homepage Support the ACLU

Join Us At:

May 8th, 2008 Google Bookmarks Technorati StumbleUpon Digg! Reddit Delicious Facebook
Posted by Suzanne Ito, ACLU at 5:06pm

Shocking: Khadr Hearings Hit Another Roadblock

The government's prosecution team has been trying to pressure Judge Peter Brownback, the military commission judge at Guantanamo, to hurry along the trial of Omar Khadr, the now-21-year-old Canadian Guantanamo detainee accused of lobbing a grenade that killed U.S. Special Forces medic Christopher Speer. Khadr was 15 when he was captured.

News from Guantanamo this afternoon tells of Brownback expressing frustration with the prosecution for not providing the necessary documentation showing the day-to-day of Khadr's six-year detention at Gitmo. The AP reports:
At a pretrial hearing, Judge Peter Brownback, an Army colonel, criticized the prosecution team led by Marine Maj. Jeffrey Groharing for demanding an expedited trial despite failing to obtain the documents from the detention center.

"I have been badgered, beaten and bruised by Maj. Groharing since the 7th of November to set a trial date," Brownback said. "To get a trial date, I need to get discovery done."
ACLU staff attorney Amrit Singh is in Guantanamo right now overseeing these pre-trial hearings as a human rights observer. She'll have more on today's developments in our DailyKos Diary tomorrow.

Today, she wrote about the pretrial hearing of Mohammed Jawad, another teen who was captured in Afghanistan and has been held at Guantanamo for six years:
At the outset of the proceedings, Jawad's military lawyer, Major David Frakt, informed the military judge, Colonel Peter Brownback, that although Jawad did not believe that he could get justice before the military commission, he had agreed to let Frakt represent him for the sole purpose of challenging the legitimacy and legality of the commission proceedings. Remarkably, when the judge asked government counsel if he had a response, he retorted that he had not anticipated that Jawad would make such an "idiotic request." Although that statement was subsequently withdrawn at the judge's direction, it was emblematic of the intemperate and contemptuous tone adopted by government counsel throughout the proceedings.
So not only did the prosecution insult the defense team, but it showed just how ignorant it is of what is going on with the military commission. Anyone reading the news about Guantanamo knows that several detainees have challenged the legitimacy of these commissions at their hearings. So to not anticipate this...well, that's idiotic.

Google Bookmarks Technorati StumbleUpon Digg! Reddit Delicious Facebook

Tags: Col. Peter Brownback, Guantanamo Dispatch, Maj. Jeffrey Groharing, Mohammed Jawad, Omar Khadr

We intend the comments portion of this blog to be a forum where you can freely express your views on blog postings and on comments made by other people. Given that, please understand that you are responsible for the material you post on the comments portion of this blog. The only postings that we ask that you refrain from posting and that we cannot permit on our website are requests for legal assistance and postings that could cause ACLU to incur legal liability.

One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites.

We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published.

Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image. Ignore spaces and be careful about upper and lower case.
 

Quicksearch


© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004
This is the Web site of the American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU Foundation.
Learn more about the distinction between these two components of the ACLU.

User Agreement | Privacy Statement | FAQs | Site Map

Statistics image