www.aclu.orgJOIN THE ACLUTAKE ACTIONDONATEABOUT US
ACLU Blog of Rights - Official Blog of the ACLU National Office Blog of Rights Homepage Support the ACLU

Join Us At:

Jan 27th, 2009 Google Bookmarks Technorati StumbleUpon Digg! Reddit Delicious Facebook
Posted by Suzanne Ito, ACLU at 10:47am

This Is a Test

On his first full day in office, President Obama addressed his senior staff and cabinet secretaries with remarks that included the following:

The way to make government responsible is to hold it accountable. And the way to make government accountable is make it transparent so that the American people can know exactly what decisions are being made, how they're being made, and whether their interests are being well served.

[…]Let me say it as simply as I can: Transparency and the rule of law will be the touchstones of this presidency."
Music to ears of civil libertarians everywhere, and it's especially welcome news to five men who are the ACLU's clients in our extraordinary rendition lawsuit. These men were kidnapped by the CIA and transported to countries where they were tortured. Jeppesen Dataplan, a subsidiary of the Boeing Company, provided the planes and flight planning services that enabled their rendition. The ACLU sued Jeppesen, charging that the company actively participated in the extraordinary rendition program by providing these services to the CIA to transport these five men.

As in our previous extraordinary rendition case on behalf of German citizen Khaled el-Masri, the district court in the Jeppesen case allowed the government—then under the Bush administration — to invoke the state secrets privilege, and accepted its claim that hearing the case in open court would jeopardize national security.

Well, the ACLU will return to court next month, and the Washington Independent's Daphne Eviatar penned an excellent article about how the upcoming oral arguments in this case will test the Obama administration's commitment to transparency, and opposition to torture. Eviatar writes:

The test of those commitments will come soon in key court cases involving CIA "black sites" and torture that the Bush administration had quashed by claiming they would reveal state secrets and endanger national security. Legal experts say that the Bush Department of Justice used what's known as the "state secrets privilege" — created originally as a narrow evidentiary privilege for sensitive national security information — as a broad shield to protect the government from exposure of its own misconduct.
Mark your calendars: Oral arguments in Jeppesen are scheduled for February 9. When Eviatar contacted the Justice Department about whether they would change their position in the case, they declined to comment. So it's wait-and-see time: we're hoping for a complete 180 from the new DOJ, and that our clients will finally see their day in court.

Google Bookmarks Technorati StumbleUpon Digg! Reddit Delicious Facebook
We intend the comments portion of this blog to be a forum where you can freely express your views on blog postings and on comments made by other people. Given that, please understand that you are responsible for the material you post on the comments portion of this blog. The only postings that we ask that you refrain from posting and that we cannot permit on our website are requests for legal assistance and postings that could cause ACLU to incur legal liability.

One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites.

We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published.

Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section.

2 Responses to "This Is a Test"

  1. Jeffrey Kaye Says:

    You are absolutely right. This will be an important test of Obama's commitment to openness, especially so as it is linked to an abhorrent national security practice. Thus far, it has been difficult to say where Obama stands when it comes to the military and intelligence interests, coming down sometimes on one side, sometimes on another. He won't be able to thread this needle forever, and the suit against Jeppesen is the type of situation that will demonstrate how committed the new administration is to changing things, especially when they are dressed in national security garb.

  2. Vic Livingston Says:

    FIGHTING TORTURE BEGINS AT HOME. ACLU MUST RECOGNIZE AND FIGHT GOV'T-FUNDED VIGILANTISM AND DOMESTIC TERRORISM.

    While ACLU's intervention in the rendition cases is important and noble, the evidence indicates that THOUSANDS of American citizens are being tortured -- yes, tortured -- in cities, towns and counties across America by way of cruel use of radiation weaponry (a/k/a "directed energy weapons") and related organized community "gang stalking" by a vigilante army operating under the cover of federally-funded community policing and anti-terrorism organizations.

    Please, ACLU, read this article -- and file a class action suit against the government agencies that have constructed these "programs of personal destruction" that continue to this day, with the apparent knowledge of local and federal law enforcement, military and intelligence personnel.

    http://www.nowpublic.com/world/gestapo-usa-govt-fund ed-vigilante-network-targets-terrorizes-u-s-citizens

    OR (if link is disabled):

    http://My.NowPublic.com/scrivener

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image. Case-sensitive.
 

Quicksearch


© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004
This is the Web site of the American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU Foundation.
Learn more about the distinction between these two components of the ACLU.

User Agreement | Privacy Statement | FAQs | Site Map

Statistics image