Unchecked Executive War Power Could Slip Through the House
Tucked inside the National Defense Authorization Act, being marked up by the House Armed Services Committee this week, is a hugely important provision that hasn't been getting a lot of attention — a brand new authorization for a worldwide war.
This stealth provision was added to the bill by the committee's chairman, Rep. Buck McKeon (R-Calif.), but has a bit of a history. It was first proposed by former Attorney General Michael Mukasey in 2008 after the Bush administration lost the Boumediene v. Bush case, in which the Supreme Court decided that federal courts would subject the administration's asserted law of war basis to hold Guantanamo detainees to searching review. An idea that may have originally been intended to bolster the Bush administration's basis for holding Guantanamo detainees is now being promoted as an authorization of a worldwide war — and could become the single biggest ceding of unchecked war authority to the executive branch in modern American history.
The current authorization of war provided the constitutional authority for the executive branch to go to war in Afghanistan. Subsequently, it has reportedly been invoked by the executive branch much more broadly to also use military force in Yemen and elsewhere, to justify torture and abuse of detainees, to eavesdrop and spy on American citizens without warrants, and to imprison people captured far from any battlefield without charge or trial.
Before Congress this week, the proposed authorization of a worldwide war goes much further, however, allowing war wherever there are terrorism suspects in any country around the world without an expiration date, geographical boundaries or connection to the 9/11 attacks or any other specific harm or threat to the United States. There have been no hearings on the provision, nor has its necessity been explained by Rep. McKeon or anyone else in Congress.
The idea that Congress is about to pass new authority for a worldwide war as we're trying to ramp down our efforts in both Iraq and Afghanistan is starting to get attention. We're hoping that the House Armed Serviced Committee, and the full House, will reconsider this troubling and dangerous provision. We'll keep you updated as this troubling provision progresses, but you can help now by telling your representative to oppose any new and expanded war authority.
Learn more about national security: Subscribe to our newsletter, follow us on Twitter, and like us on Facebook.


May 12th, 2011 at 11:09pm
Hideous and of course Illegal with an Illegitimate President.
May 13th, 2011 at 3:08am
Is Bin laden killing legal?
May 14th, 2011 at 3:29pm
Why would congress abrogate its own power to approve or disapprove a war declaration?
May 15th, 2011 at 3:03am
the constitution gives the power to declare war to congress, not the president. further, the constitution nowhere allows congress to delegate such power.
May 15th, 2011 at 11:19am
It would appear that we are already operating under same, even if not authorized.
May 17th, 2011 at 2:32am
Sounds kickass. I'll be sure to tell my reps to vote for this.
May 17th, 2011 at 4:43am
About time it's called WWIII, I smell the draft in America
May 17th, 2011 at 6:48pm
The warloards in Washington need to satisfy their lust for blood and oil.
May 17th, 2011 at 8:29pm
Yes, because a president who was born in Hawaii and who soundly trounces the opposition, who happened to ACTUALLY be born in another country is an illegitimate president...
May 18th, 2011 at 12:16am
Read Confessions of an economic hitman
Bilderberg group
May 19th, 2011 at 9:48am
re: #7 ....If they did re-activate the DRAFT , do you think it would be enough to wake people up ?
Post new comment