Categories
Join Us At:
|
Unsung Hits of the FISA Debate: An "Uneasy Partnership"
Day Four of our FISA series on DailyKos deals with birth of the wiretapping program in the 90's, and how Bush ramped up the program as soon as he took
 office. This rush to spy resulted in an "uneasy partnership" between the NSA and the phone companies: Phone companies apart from Qwest had reservations about the program. We know Qwest was approached long before 9/11 and refused to participate. Now we know that at least one more company had concerns about the legality of the program and "balked" in 2004. This undercuts the government's claims that everyone agreed the programs were legal."Congress is back in session today, and one of the top orders of business is debating the FISA Amendments Act of 2007 in the Senate. Today we joined with more than 70 coalition partners in calling for Senator Harry Reid (D-Nev.) to bring the Senate Judiciary Committee's version of the FISA Amendments Act of 2007 to the floor instead of the Senate Intelligence Committee's bill. We've also launched a radio ad campaign asking citizens to call their senators and tell them to say "No" to Bush's wiretap bill, which would give immunity to telecom companies that have cooperated with the NSA's spy program. Bush's bill would also authorize wiretapping without warrants. Give the ad a listen, give your senators a call and please sign our petition. We'll deliver that petition to Senator Reid this week.
|
|
|
© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004 |
One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites.
We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published.
Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section.