www.aclu.orgJOIN THE ACLUTAKE ACTIONDONATEABOUT US
ACLU Blog of Rights - Official Blog of the ACLU National Office Blog of Rights Homepage Support the ACLU

Join Us At:

Oct 1st, 2008 Google Bookmarks Technorati StumbleUpon Digg! Reddit Delicious Facebook
Posted by Will Matthews, ACLU at 2:35pm

Health Commission Gets Tough on "America's Toughest Sheriff"

Big news reverberated out of Maricopa County, Ariz., yesterday when it was made public that the National Commission on Correctional Health Care (NCCHC) last week stripped all of Maricopa County's Sheriff's Office jails — run by the infamous Sheriff Joe Arpaio — of their accreditation. Not only did the NCCHC say (PDF) it was terminating its accreditation because of the county's failure to maintain levels of medical and mental health care that meet national standards, but it also accused county officials of providing false information about their compliance. In other words, they lied in an effort to cover up grossly inadequate conditions. That shouldn't come as much of a surprise though: as this is pretty par for the course for Arpaio, who refers to himself as "America's toughest sheriff," has bragged recently about spending only 30 cents a day on meals served to the pre-trial detainees housed at the Maricopa County Jail and is famous for forcing them to eat outdated and oxidized green bologna.

Thanks to the work of lawyers from the ACLU's National Prison Project, however, Arpaio's deceit and inhumanity are being exposed to a degree never before seen. A ruling in an ACLU lawsuit that seeks to force Arpaio to be accountable to a federal consent decree mandating that he maintain conditions at the jail that meet constitutional minimums is expected any day. In seeking to prove that Arpaio must be subjected to federal court oversight, lawyers spent nearly two months in trial documenting a laundry list of egregious stories that crystallize just how callous and out of control Arpaio and his deputies are. Among the most horrific: the story of Juan Mendoza Farias, booked for a DUI-related probation violation who died in custody with blunt force injuries on his face, torso and limbs, according to the county medical examiner. Another: the death at the hands of officers of 33-year-old Charles Agster, a mentally retarded man who weighed 125 pounds. A jury awarded Agster's family $9 million in damages in 2006 — one of over 2,500 inmate lawsuits against Arpaio that have cost the county more than $42 million.

What's ironic about the NCCHC stripping Maricopa County of its accreditation is that the county had used that very accreditation as one of its primary defenses against the ACLU's charges that there are grossly inadequate conditions in existence that need to be fixed immediately. Perhaps the NCCHC saw which way the wind was blowing in the ACLU's case and couldn't imagine accrediting an outfit that was found to be in violation of the Constitution by a federal judge. Either way, it is clear that Arpaio's tough guy attitude is beginning to wear very thin.

Google Bookmarks Technorati StumbleUpon Digg! Reddit Delicious Facebook
We intend the comments portion of this blog to be a forum where you can freely express your views on blog postings and on comments made by other people. Given that, please understand that you are responsible for the material you post on the comments portion of this blog. The only postings that we ask that you refrain from posting and that we cannot permit on our website are requests for legal assistance and postings that could cause ACLU to incur legal liability.

One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites.

We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published.

Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section.

7 Responses to "Health Commission Gets Tough on "America's Toughest Sheriff""

  1. Liberal hater Says:

    The American Criminal Liberties Union are cowards.
    Always for the criminal and always against law enforcement.
    Maybe next time a member of the ACLU is about to get, oh I don't know, raped or murdered or carjacked or be robbed maybe they will call out for help to a criminal they've helped since they hate the police so much!

  2. Ian Says:

    Awesome news, good to see such despicable people in positions of authority finally held accountable for their actions. Hopefully criminal charges can be filed against this monster.

  3. Rob Says:

    The moral of the story here is, Stay out of jail and dont break the law. Dont do the crime if you cant do the time. The jail is not Burger King, You cant have things your own way. Get a life, ACLU.

  4. yoopergirl Says:

    I can find everywhere that the ACLU had Arpaio in court for substandard jail conditions but I cannot find just what the outcome of that court case was. Anyone have any ideas?

  5. yoopergirl Says:

    I am aware of the court case against Arpaio for feeding inmates rotten food. But I can't find out what the results of that case are. Can anyone help?

  6. PATinPNS Says:

    There is a big difference between jail being a country club, and basic humanitarian needs, IE, feeding spoiled or out-dated foods, poor living conditions, unhealthy standards or lack of, for the prisoners.

    I will grant you, the best way to stop being treated this way is to not do the crime. As good as that may sound, it is not the answer. People are humans. They are going to commit crimes. There are those in our society who are mentally challenged. They need protection from abuse from fellow prisoners and especially those hired to protect them.

    You GO, ACLU. Although I do not agree with all your stands, somebody has to watch out for us little guys.

    Thanks for all you do!

  7. A.Taylor Says:

    Anyone that belives the police can stop crime is a fool. They only show up to agree that a crime has happened so the insurance company will know to pay a claim. Other than that most of them are only there for the power play over those not in their club.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image. Ignore spaces and be careful about upper and lower case.
 

Quicksearch


© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004
This is the Web site of the American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU Foundation.
Learn more about the distinction between these two components of the ACLU.

User Agreement | Privacy Statement | FAQs | Site Map

Statistics image