<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.aclu.org/blog/lgbt-rights" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Lgbt Rights Blog Posts</title>
    <link>http://www.aclu.org/blog/lgbt-rights</link>
    <description></description>
    <language>en</language>
        <item>
<title>Et Uxor</title>
<link>http://www.aclu.org/blog/lgbt-rights/et-uxor</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>As I read those words at the end of the title of a newly issued case from a federal appeals court in California, my high school Latin came flooding back to me and I got teary-eyed.</p><br />
<p><a href="http://www.blackslawdictionary.com/">Black&rsquo;s Law Dictionary</a> defines the term &ldquo;Et uxor&rdquo; as &ldquo;And his wife.&rdquo; Except in this circumstance, the court used it (appropriately) to mean &ldquo;And her wife.&rdquo;  Times have changed, even for the federal judiciary.</p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.aclu.org/blog/lgbt-rights/et-uxor#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:57:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>suzanne_ito</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">20348 at http://www.aclu.org</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Honoring Those We’ve Lost, Fighting for Those Still Here</title>
<link>http://www.aclu.org/blog/lgbt-rights/honoring-those-we-ve-lost-fighting-those-still-here</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Today marks the 11th Annual <a href="http://www.transgenderdor.org/">Transgender Day of Remembrance</a>, a day to honor those among us whose deaths were a result of prejudice against transgender people. The day serves as a sad reminder that, as much as we are moving towards tolerance and societal acceptance of transgender people, physical violence continues to be a threat in our communities.</p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.aclu.org/blog/lgbt-rights/honoring-those-we-ve-lost-fighting-those-still-here#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:44:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>suzanne_ito</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">20347 at http://www.aclu.org</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Gay  Marriage in N.J.: Which Side of History Will You Be On?</title>
<link>http://www.aclu.org/blog/lgbt-rights/gay-marriage-nj-which-side-history-will-you-be</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.nj.com/njv_guest_blog/2009/11/same-sex_marriages_should_enco.html"><em>(Originally posted in the </em>New Jersey Star-Ledger.)</a></p><br />
<p>As our state legislature gears up  to vote on  marriage equality in the lame-duck session, we have one  question for lawmakers: Which side of history do you want to be on?</p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.aclu.org/blog/lgbt-rights/gay-marriage-nj-which-side-history-will-you-be#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:55:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>suzanne_ito</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">20325 at http://www.aclu.org</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Victory in Washington: Domestic Partnerships Win the Popular Vote</title>
<link>http://www.aclu.org/blog/lgbt-rights/victory-washington-domestic-partnerships-win-popular-vote</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Although the ballots are still being counted, last night <a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/politics/2010213134_referendum06m.html">news</a> <a href="http://blog.seattlepi.com/seattlepolitics/archives/184263.asp">outlets</a> called Washington State&rsquo;s domestic partnership referendum in our favor! As of late Thursday, we were wining by 52 to 48 percent, a deficit the Seattle Times called &ldquo;<a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/politics/2010213134_referendum06m.html">insurmountable</a>&rdquo; for the opponents of gay rights.</p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.aclu.org/blog/lgbt-rights/victory-washington-domestic-partnerships-win-popular-vote#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:56:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>suzanne_ito</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">20151 at http://www.aclu.org</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Senate to Hold  Landmark ENDA Hearing — ACLU to Tweet LIVE!</title>
<link>http://www.aclu.org/blog/lgbt-rights/senate-hold-landmark-enda-hearing-aclu-tweet-live</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Tomorrow morning at 10 a.m., the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee will hold a hearing on <a href="http://www.aclu.org/hiv-aids_lgbt-rights/employment-non-discrimination-act">the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA)</a>. This will be the first Senate hearing on ENDA since 2002. The legislation would help to ensure workplace equality by protecting LGBT workers from employment discrimination.</p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.aclu.org/blog/lgbt-rights/senate-hold-landmark-enda-hearing-aclu-tweet-live#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.aclu.org/category/tags/enda">enda</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:17:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>suzanne_ito</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">19981 at http://www.aclu.org</guid>
</item><item>
<title>One Big Disappointment, Lots of Victories</title>
<link>http://www.aclu.org/blog/lgbt-rights/one-big-disappointment-lots-victories</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I&rsquo;m not going to try to spin it: Our loss in Maine yesterday, where voters rejected a law that would have given same-sex couples the right to marry, was deeply disappointing and discouraging.  All of us here at the LGBT Project started yesterday hopeful and were further encouraged by reports that turnout was well above what was expected.</p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.aclu.org/blog/lgbt-rights/one-big-disappointment-lots-victories#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:25:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>suzanne_ito</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">19962 at http://www.aclu.org</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Why ENDA Matters: True Stories of Anti-LGBT Employment Discrimination from the ACLU</title>
<link>http://www.aclu.org/blog/lgbt-rights/why-enda-matters-true-stories-anti-lgbt-employment-discrimination-aclu</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Why ENDA Matters: True Stories of Anti-LGBT Employment Discrimination from the ACLU</p><br />
<p><em>(This post originally appeared on </em><a href="http://www.bilerico.com/2009/10/why_enda_matters_true_stories_of_anti-lgbt_employm_1.php">The Bilerico Project</a><em>.)</em></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.aclu.org/blog/lgbt-rights/why-enda-matters-true-stories-anti-lgbt-employment-discrimination-aclu#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:45:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>suzanne_ito</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">19927 at http://www.aclu.org</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Seven Reasons to Vote Approve on R-71: Reason #7</title>
<link>http://www.aclu.org/blog/lgbt-rights/seven-reasons-vote-approve-r-71-reason-7</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><em>On November 3, Washington voters will have the chance to approve or reject R-71, a measure that will allow same-sex couples and unmarried opposite-sex seniors to access many of the rights and protections granted to married couples. We're counting down to Election Day with a series of seven videos, each a powerful illustration of why it's so important to approve R-71.</em></p><br />
<p>Reason #7: Spokane domestic partners Marge and Diane</p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.aclu.org/blog/lgbt-rights/seven-reasons-vote-approve-r-71-reason-7#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jennie Corman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">19916 at http://www.aclu.org</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Seven Reasons to Vote Approve on R-71: Reason #6</title>
<link>http://www.aclu.org/blog/lgbt-rights/seven-reasons-vote-approve-r-71-reason-6</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><i>On November 3, Washington voters will have the chance to approve or reject R-71, a measure that will allow same-sex couples and unmarried opposite-sex seniors to access many of the rights and protections granted to married couples. We&rsquo;re counting down to Election Day with a series of seven videos, each a powerful illustration of why it&rsquo;s so important to approve R-71.</i></p><br />
<p>Reason #6: Senior domestic partners Rose and Joe</p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.aclu.org/blog/lgbt-rights/seven-reasons-vote-approve-r-71-reason-6#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 13:26:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jessica Monaco</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">19879 at http://www.aclu.org</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Seven Reasons to Vote Approve on R-71: Reason #5</title>
<link>http://www.aclu.org/blog/lgbt-rights/seven-reasons-vote-approve-r-71-reason-5</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><i> On November 3, Washington voters will have the chance to approve or reject R-71, a measure that will allow same-sex couples and unmarried opposite-sex seniors to access many of the rights and protections granted to married couples. We&#8217;re counting down to Election Day with a series of seven videos, each a powerful illustration of why it&#8217;s so important to approve R-71.</i></p><br />
<p>Reason #5: Firefighters Penny and Karen and their son Calder</p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.aclu.org/blog/lgbt-rights/seven-reasons-vote-approve-r-71-reason-5#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 14:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jessica Monaco</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">19881 at http://www.aclu.org</guid>
</item>  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- Page cached by Boost @ 2009-11-20 17:26:32, expires @ 2009-11-20 18:26:32 -->
